WotC WotC's Chris Perkins On D&D's Inclusivity Processes Going Forward

Status
Not open for further replies.
Over on D&D Beyond, WotC's Chris Perkins has written a blog entry about how the company's processes have been changed to improve the way the D&D studio deals with harmful content and inclusivity. This follows recent issues with racist content in Spelljammer: Adventures in Space, and involves working with external cultural consultants.

The studio’s new process mandates that every word, illustration, and map must be reviewed by multiple outside cultural consultants prior to publication.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Everyone is jumping on mentioning Black Panther, which is fair, but as an avid Leigh Bardugo fan i gotta say that race is actually pretty damn important in Shadow and Bone as well. Later seasons that tackle later books will probably get into it more, but they literally changed the race of the main character in a way that has significant bearing on how she's treated.

I'll also add that Japanese media is very far from above reproach with regards to anti-black racism and exclusion. This goes doubly for Japanese media that leans very heavily on white representation.

e: ... yikes...
 

log in or register to remove this ad


The real goal should be to tell a good or fun story and get the audience to love the characters.

The people don't want to spend their money to feel being preached about what is right or wrong or about what to feel ashamed guilty and ashamed. It is not only some movie or teleserie. If I suspect the producers want to brainwash me then bye-bye.

My point of view may different because I am Spanish and here the mixture of blood isn't rare at all. Our land has been a bridge between three continents, Europe, Africa and America.

Juan Latino or Juan de Sessa was the first black person who studied at a European university and who reached a professorship on Grammar and Latin Language at the University of Granada.

Other point. Today some players could use current conspiracy theories as source of inspiration, even when they don't believe them, and specially because they don't believe them.

Racism is wrong, but reporting it isn't enough. For a better coexistence we have to work together to create an atmosphere of mutual trust, and this can't be demmanded, but everybody has to make an effort to earn it.
 

However, as still others have said, that doesn't excuse poor story writing.
No one said it does. And the fact that you think people are saying that is more than a bit worrying.
Having a diverse cast can be done well, or it can be forced, and when it is forced, it feels forced. It is not good storytelling.
There is literally nothing anyone can do to include marginalized minorities in modern media without some idiot online accusing it of having "forced inclusion". People accused Shang-Chi of being "woke" before it even came out because the main character is Asian. People accused the Sequel Trilogy of Star Wars of being "woke" because one of the main characters is black.

There is always a conscious decision to include diversity in a piece of media. That means all inclusion is "forced". There is no form of inclusion that won't feel "forced" to some stupid bigot online. Trying to appease to the bigots does not make good storytelling.
 

No one said it does. And the fact that you think people are saying that is more than a bit worrying.

There is literally nothing anyone can do to include marginalized minorities in modern media without some idiot online accusing it of having "forced inclusion". People accused Shang-Chi of being "woke" before it even came out because the main character is Asian. People accused the Sequel Trilogy of Star Wars of being "woke" because one of the main characters is black.

There is always a conscious decision to include diversity in a piece of media. That means all inclusion is "forced". There is no form of inclusion that won't feel "forced" to some stupid bigot online. Trying to appease to the bigots does not make good storytelling.
Are you saying that's really no scale of  how forced it can be, because there will always be some idiots who complain about any amount of diversity? That seems a pretty uncharitable read to me.
 

Are you saying that's really no scale of  how forced it can be, because there will always be some idiots who complain about any amount of diversity? That seems a pretty uncharitable read to me.
In my experience, the majority of time that people complain about "forced inclusion", they're actually just bigots scrambling for a "reasonable" excuse for why they're so angry at the movie/show for including diversity.
 

The real goal should be to tell a good or fun story and get the audience to love the characters.

I don't think anyone claimed that casting X or Y was the key to create better or worse stories. There are different metrics for appreciating a work and they don't really interfere which each other. Baroque music is the best in the world but I wouldn't say that having harpsichords in a film score makes the scenario better. So sure, it's better (an the only moral thing to do IMO) to hire a people without discriminating against certain ethnicities, but it has no bearing on the quality of the result, for better or worse. Then anyone can set how they ponderate the criterions in their overall appreciation of the film.

The people don't want to spend their money to feel being preached about what is right or wrong or about what to feel ashamed guilty and ashamed. It is not only some movie or teleserie. If I suspect the producers want to brainwash me then bye-bye.

Especially when I feel the preaching is about a social problem that has no relation with the social problems plaguing the society I live in (in which case I could relate), but it was related to a whole other set of social problems. It just make shows odd and distract from the overall intelligibility. Though such situation are not THAT common in my experience.


My point of view may different because I am Spanish and here the mixture of blood isn't rare at all. Our land has been a bridge between three continents, Europe, Africa and America.

Indeed. That is not to say that there are no problem on the East side of the Atlantic, but racists are using other targets than the WASP/African American divide.

Other point. Today some players could use current conspiracy theories as source of inspiration, even when they don't believe them, and specially because they don't believe them.

I don't think satyre is a safe thing to engage with in a published product, though, and is best kept to groups that know each other well enough.
 
Last edited:

Interestingly Black Panther/Wakanda was mentioned as being diverse, but is it really? Unless the new definition of "diverse" is now just "not white". Wakanda is entirely populated by black people. How is that diverse? Now from my own perspective this is not a problem at all. It is an insular nation in Africa. Why would they be anything other than black? Likewise Disney's live-action version of Mulan has probably the least diverse cast in modern history. Go look at the casting page. They are all Asian and as far as I can tell they are not just Asian, but almost exclusively Chinese. Again, for me this isn't a problem when you are representing ancient China, but it is not diverse!

There has been some recent criticism of Final Fantasy XVI being all white. Keep in mind that this is a game created by a Japanese company that has no Japanese people represented in it. But because it is an insular society based on medieval Europe where everyone is white it is "bad", but Wakanda, an insular society in Africa where everyone is black, is "good". That's a double standard isn't it?
Not really.

There are, in my rough estimation, ten billion Marvel comics that have been turned into movies or TVs. Most of them are very white. One movie (well, two, since Black Panther has a sequel) and one TV show (Luke Cage) have almost-entirely-Black casts, as far as I know (I fully admit to not seeing a huge number of their movies or shows). And in both cases, it makes sense in-universe--especially in Black Panther, which is an insular society that has deliberately had limited contact with the outside world for basically ever. And Luke Cage takes place in Harlem, which until recently was a predominately Black neighborhood (the current census puts it as a Latino majority).

Whereas with a show like RoP, it appears (from what people have been saying) that there has been a slow but constant mix of cultures for hundreds of thousands of years. Harfoots apparently travel quite a bit. There have presumably been traveling merchants, maybe even merchant caravans, going from place to place. People have explored. There would be a mixture of cultures and skin colors. And probably to a greater degree than you might think, since unless the writers actively decide that one group thinks they're better than other people because of their skin color, then there wouldn't be nearly as much discrimination and people would be more welcome in other places.

Also, from a meta-perspective, up until very, very recently, everything was geared to white people. Many or most shows, movies, and comics didn't have any non-white people in them as main characters, or even as secondary characters. A lot of them didn't even have women except as disposable love interests (and definitely not any non cishet characters). This wasn't even necessarily for racist or sexist reasons--the media were created by people who were white men who were catering to the demographic they were in. Which means that these white characters were only white or male by default, not because they were supposed to be white or male or because white maleness was an integral part of the character. Changing race doesn't actually change the character, and in many cases, neither does changing sex, gender, or sexual orientation. Maybe it would be slightly weird if DC decided Bruce Wayne was Black or Latino, but only because he's supposed to come from old money, and there weren't a lot of billionaire non-white people a hundred years ago. The rest of his story would be the totally same, however.

But when creators (both white male and not) and created non-white, non-male characters, they did so deliberately. Black Panther and Luke Cage are supposed to be Black, and turning them white would change the characters. Adding in white people to Wakanda would change that country beyond what it was supposed to be, and adding in more white characters would dilute the story's intent.
 


Maybe it would be slightly weird if DC decided Bruce Wayne was Black or Latino, but only because he's supposed to come from old money, and there weren't a lot of billionaire non-white people a hundred years ago. The rest of his story would be the totally same, however.
Side note: Anyone interested in what it would be like to have a Black man with the resources, methods and intensity of Batman should check out Marvel's 2016 Nighthawk six-issue series. (There are a bunch of versions of this character, so it's just this specific one.)

Being a Black man, even if he's still a billionaire with a fetish for working out and beating up bad guys, does change Batman quite a bit.

It's an extremely interesting read, although sadly, the character died soon after that series and was succeeded by two different Nighthawks, because comics.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top