bedir than
Full Moon Storyteller
D&D is bringing in this much a quarter(i.e. D&D is generating $100M to $150M per year),
D&D is bringing in this much a quarter(i.e. D&D is generating $100M to $150M per year),
That was not my understanding:D&D is bringing in this much a quarter
Arpiné Kocharyan, a UBS analyst, estimates that D&D is now responsible for $100 million to $150 million in annual revenue.
Yes, except Bestiary 6 is not aimed at players just like Bestiary 1 wasn't, and as far as I know Adventurer's Armory 2 is more of a niche product so it seems unlikely to cause confusion.I see that, and raise you the Bestiary 6 and the Adventurer's Armory 2.
Heck, even the upcoming Pathfinder Remastered will be giving us the Player Core 2.
I'm of the opinion that the RPG community (in general) wouldn't find any of that confusing, even if wider demographics generally think that 1/3 lb. hamburgers are smaller than 1/4 lb. hamburgers, but apparently that's elitist of me!Yes, except Bestiary 6 is not aimed at players just like Bestiary 1 wasn't, and as far as I know Adventurer's Armory 2 is more of a niche product so it seems unlikely to cause confusion.
Player Core 2 sounds problematic, though.
Well, the PF ones anyway. But have you seen the way bonuses in PF1e work. Some arithmetic skills are required for playing ;-)I'm of the opinion that the RPG community wouldn't find any of that confusing, even if wider demographics think that 1/3 lb. hamburgers are smaller than 1/4 lb. hamburgers, but apparently that's elitist of me!![]()
They aren't books of crunch. I don't want to have to buy 2/3 of something I don't want to get 1/3 that I want. Calling those crunch books is like calling adventures setting books since they have some setting material inside of them.
Fair enough. I was only thinking of hardcovers to be honest. But, honestly, I don't think my point is too far off. Yes, there might be room to produce more, particularly if they go with cheaper soft covers. But, the basic point still remains - why would they?
I mean, I'm not trying to be snarky here or anything. But, what's in it for WotC to change the formula? They are still having record growth. The industry is the healthiest it has ever been in the history of the industry. I just can't see what the upside is for changing what they're doing.
Good grief, and this isn't directed at anyone specific, but, if you add in the DM's Guild stuff, you couldn't possibly play more than a tiny slice of what's already available. Unhappy about Spelljammer? DM's Guild has a very well done 20 level Spelljammer Adventure path. Great stuff. Heck, and it's already done for Fantasy Grounds as well. What more could I actually want?
I have been debating that about the Planescape stuff, how much of this do I actually want/need?It's one of the reasons I use DDB, I can buy the 1/3 that I actually need.
Since I run a homebrew campaign it works for me most of the time to just get the monsters because I'm a sucker for new monsters that I will likely never use. Sometimes I get magic items as well, but I almost never bother with races.I have been debating that about the Planescape stuff, how much of this do I actually want/need?
Also homebrew. But I do the opposite and pick up all the new races in case the players need them (current world is wide open).Since I run a homebrew campaign it works for me most of the time to just get the monsters because I'm a sucker for new monsters that I will likely never use. Sometimes I get magic items as well, but I almost never bother with races.