FWIW, my Wills & Estates professor Stanley Johanson- and a goodly percentage of the other UT Law faculty members I knew- would probably strongly agree with you.
There was a predominant sentiment that good, clear language was to be preferred whenever you were drafting documents. Clarity prevented disagreements and let all parties know their rights & responsibilities. As Prof. Johanson once put it, if you were in court defending clauses in your documents, you’ve probably failed your client in some way.
One of his examples: he’d give everyone in the class a 25pg document for us to read in class. At some point, he’d stop us and ask how many had finished it. No one would raise a hand. He’d then instruct us to read the last page, which had 2-3 paragraphs on it, taking up maybe 3/4 of the page.
“That last page has the exact same information and legal force as the prior 24. It is merely drafted clearly and concisely, without legalese. If I ever encounter a document drafted by one of you that reads more like the first 24 pages of this handout than the last, I will hunt you down myself.”
I believe him. I won’t feel safe even after he passes away. (He’s been on UT Law’s faculty since 1963.)