Today I learned +

Today I learned, while listening to a "Dark stuff" podcast, that Chernobyl/Chornobyl means wormwood/absinthe/ajenjo. And that someone placed a memorial featuring the biblical third angel with a trumpet from the Book of Revelation in-site in 2011.

 

log in or register to remove this ad




TIL about Ksenia Coffman and her long one-woman mission to scrub Nazi apologism and fanfiction off the WW2 history sections of Wikipedia, and I applaud her commitment to truth.


“Coffman navigates over to the Wikipedia article about one of the conspirators—Arthur Nebe, a high-ranking member of the SS. Apart from his role in the plot, Nebe’s main claim to notability is that he came up with the idea of turning vans into mobile gas chambers by piping in exhaust fumes. The article acknowledges both of these facts, along with the detail that Nebe tested his system on the mentally ill. But it also says that he worked to “reduce the atrocities committed,” going so far as to give his bloodthirsty superiors inflated death totals.

Coffman will recall that she feels “totally disoriented.” She cannot believe that an innovator in mass murder would have tried to protect the Jews and other supposed subhumans his troops rounded up. She checks the footnotes. The claim is attributed to War of Extermination, a compendium of academic essays originally published in 1995.

Coffman knows the book is legit, because she happens to have a copy on loan from the library. When she goes to the cited page, she finds a paragraph that appears to confirm all the Wikipedia article’s wild claims. But then she reads the first sentence of the next paragraph: “This is, of course, nonsense.”

The level of bad faith is eye-opening for Coffman. She is “very appalled.” She sees that her confidence in Wikipedia was “very much misplaced.” All it takes to warp historical memory, she realizes, is something this small, achievable for almost anyone with a keyboard. “So few people can have so much impact, it’s a little scary,” she says. She begins to turn a more critical eye to what she sees on Wikipedia. Especially the footnotes.“
 



Roman clothing didn’t have pockets. They used small packs on shoulder straps and belts, armbands thst could hold a small quantity of stuff, and carried bags, along with other ways of dealing with things they wanted to take around with them. So if you’re ever shifted back to the Roman republic or empire, invent pockets.

Source: the altogether fascinating and fun https://www.amazon.com/Populus-Living-Dying-Ancient-Rome/dp/B0D6P9G4JZ/ - this is a book for general readers, which doesn’t expect you to know much of anything about Roman history. This is the kind of info I wish more RPGs provided.
 

Roman clothing didn’t have pockets. They used small packs on shoulder straps and belts, armbands thst could hold a small quantity of stuff, and carried bags, along with other ways of dealing with things they wanted to take around with them. So if you’re ever shifted back to the Roman republic or empire, invent pockets.

Source: the altogether fascinating and fun https://www.amazon.com/Populus-Living-Dying-Ancient-Rome/dp/B0D6P9G4JZ/ - this is a book for general readers, which doesn’t expect you to know much of anything about Roman history. This is the kind of info I wish more RPGs provided.
Pockets as we know it is a pretty late invention. you would hvae small bags/purses ties to your belt, or in later eras you would have stand-alone pockets that you tied around your waist underneath the clothing, but you had slits in the clothes so you could reach them.
 


Remove ads

Top