The problem is that ppl thinking the Gilgamesh rote unconsciously stage fights in their mind where there is a 1st lvl 3e wizard vs a 1st lvl 4e wizard and it colors their thinking process.
There is a simple definition for the above: you are not running a game, you are running a simulation.
It can be perfectly fine and entertaining to the right ppl but it is not the basis of what DnD has been built for. It is not what it aims for. Any version of DnD. 3E might have enabled a way to...
We don't need rules for that. Most explicitly, there is no rules for that.
When a DM defines the world only around the PC's bubble of influence that doesn't stop the above quoted exemple from being possible from happening. You simply define that when the PCs come back to town, if they do...
http://www.enworld.org/subscriptions.php?
Why does it cost 7$ more if we want to become a supporter for 2 years(87$), versus 1 year(40$) multiplied by 2? Shouldn't it be the other way around, marketing-wise?
One more step toward confirmation of what I think multiclassing will be. I still think you take feats, and that they are feat chains, and how much of them you have decides how deep your are multiclassed.
Well, seems it's me being out of the loop a bit after reading a few posts here.
Is there a page/thread to get more info on the next version of the site?
Ok we are april 2nd now. No more april fools (The OdnD one was nice though, so was Wizard's)
Is it me just being too tired from overwork and noticed the countdown just now at the top?
It's funny seeing ppl argue about throwing sand 1/day as if it was an actual 4e rule and then watch them try to defend it or shoot it down.
(I am sure you guys know it isn't, but you are acting as if it is and it's putting a smile on my lips)