Marandahir
Crown-Forester (he/him)
Agreed, but WotC has apparently decided that Fighting Styles are not worth half a feat anymore.I kind of feel like the feat should be.
*gain a fighting style
*gain a weapon mastery
Instead of 2 different feats.
Agreed, but WotC has apparently decided that Fighting Styles are not worth half a feat anymore.I kind of feel like the feat should be.
*gain a fighting style
*gain a weapon mastery
Instead of 2 different feats.
Or... let them opt into it with the Weapon Mastery feat.I am torn between giving it to them or not.
Maybe a single mastery they only can retrain at level up. Would be significantly less versatile, but could help them fill theor niche better.
That's an opinion.I know. It is awful. Blade bards are so much more fun.
Yo. I'm here.Blargh.
Selfish is more fun. I have yet to see anyone play a bard who spends their combat turns on support and control.
You never see bards casting dissonant whispers? Faerie fire? Heroism? Tasha's hideous laughter? Sleep? Healing word? And those are just the first-level spells.Blargh.
Selfish is more fun. I have yet to see anyone play a bard who spends their combat turns on support and control.
Bards have never been better than 5e one. I would argue they are THE most improved class in 5e (with the new 2024 monk being a possible second)
I kind of feel like the feat should be.
*gain a fighting style
*gain a weapon mastery
Instead of 2 different feats.
Are there any bard specific only spells above 5th level?There were comments earlier that bards no longer need a spell list above 5th level spells but that precludes bard specific spells or spells shared with sorcerers or warlocks that are not on the other lists.
We don't know. There were very few in the past and those ended up getting added to other lists already.Are there any bard specific only spells above 5th level?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.