Tonguez
A suffusion of yellow
OT Again - well sort of
As Li Shenron said systematic classification of animals isn't a precise science and moreover the old Linnaeus system (as above) is very much falling out of flavour in favour of cladistic systems.
The Old System split all animals into Mammal - Bird- Reptile- Amphibian- Fish which meant that things like Platypus had to be shoe-horned in somewhere. Newer Cladistic systems have shown that Birds should infact be listed as Reptiles and whilst debate still remains as to Monotremata it has been pointed out that Platypi share more reptialian traits than they do mammal viz
in terms of mammalian traits they have fur, produce milk (but have no teats) and have some mammalian bone structures (but so did Therapsids). SO anyway Monteremes are either very primitive mammals, advanced reptiles or something else (ie Therapsids) I myself like the idea that they are Therapsids...
Now how is this relevant to DnD - um it does allow for classification of monsters and races in a slightly different manner eg as I suggested earlier Kobolds might be therapsids too, I have also conceived Lizardmen as being more avian than 'reptile' and even suggested that Dragons could be classified as either Avians or Therapsids.
As to dwarfs - the idea that they are marsupials is appealing in an ick! kind of way
Henry said:Platypus
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Monotremata
Family: Ornithorhynchidae
Genus: Ornithorhynchus
Species: Ornithorhynchus anatinus
Monotremes are mammals.
As Li Shenron said systematic classification of animals isn't a precise science and moreover the old Linnaeus system (as above) is very much falling out of flavour in favour of cladistic systems.
The Old System split all animals into Mammal - Bird- Reptile- Amphibian- Fish which meant that things like Platypus had to be shoe-horned in somewhere. Newer Cladistic systems have shown that Birds should infact be listed as Reptiles and whilst debate still remains as to Monotremata it has been pointed out that Platypi share more reptialian traits than they do mammal viz
- egg laying and reptilian ovaries
reptilian bone structures (like those of a cynodonts incidentally)
very low metabolic rate
reptilian gait (legs at sides)
venomous spurs (unique in mammals but common amongst reptiles)
Monotremes have a cloaca (a single intestinal, urinary, and genital tracts) which is a reptilian feature
in terms of mammalian traits they have fur, produce milk (but have no teats) and have some mammalian bone structures (but so did Therapsids). SO anyway Monteremes are either very primitive mammals, advanced reptiles or something else (ie Therapsids) I myself like the idea that they are Therapsids...
Now how is this relevant to DnD - um it does allow for classification of monsters and races in a slightly different manner eg as I suggested earlier Kobolds might be therapsids too, I have also conceived Lizardmen as being more avian than 'reptile' and even suggested that Dragons could be classified as either Avians or Therapsids.
As to dwarfs - the idea that they are marsupials is appealing in an ick! kind of way
