Tyrion Alb
First Post
Allegedly written in Playstation magazine [taken from RA Salvatore's web site (emphasis mine)]:
"So you want to get your Dungeons and Dragons on, but you don't have a group of fellow antisocialites handy and you're not too keen on the top-down, hack-n-slash experience of the Baldur's Gates of the world. You're in luck: Forgotten Realms is a straightforward beat-em-up -- combos and all -- that's solidly grounded in the D&D rule book. <snip> No word yet on multiplayer, but we're hoping for some"
[rant]
"Group of antisocialites"? Okay now isn't that statement an oxymoron? What the hell is that all about?
And then, "No word on mulitplayer yet"? Okay, so it is okay to sit around and play videogames by yourself all day but it is not okay so sit with a group of friends for some social gaming fun? Is that really what PlayStation Magazine is insinuating?
While this writer might have meant to be tongue-in-cheek, I somehow doubt it. IMO, it just helps the "gamers are socially retarded geeks" stigma associated with RPGs.
When me and my friends all go out, no one who did not know us before would have ever guessed that we played "that D&D Game". Why not? I guess we don't "look" or "act" like what people expect gamers to "look" and "act" like? Can you tell a person is a gamer just by looking at them? Of course not. It is crap like this, written this time in a videogaming magazine, that helps perpetuate this nonsense.
[/rant]
"So you want to get your Dungeons and Dragons on, but you don't have a group of fellow antisocialites handy and you're not too keen on the top-down, hack-n-slash experience of the Baldur's Gates of the world. You're in luck: Forgotten Realms is a straightforward beat-em-up -- combos and all -- that's solidly grounded in the D&D rule book. <snip> No word yet on multiplayer, but we're hoping for some"
[rant]
"Group of antisocialites"? Okay now isn't that statement an oxymoron? What the hell is that all about?
And then, "No word on mulitplayer yet"? Okay, so it is okay to sit around and play videogames by yourself all day but it is not okay so sit with a group of friends for some social gaming fun? Is that really what PlayStation Magazine is insinuating?
While this writer might have meant to be tongue-in-cheek, I somehow doubt it. IMO, it just helps the "gamers are socially retarded geeks" stigma associated with RPGs.
When me and my friends all go out, no one who did not know us before would have ever guessed that we played "that D&D Game". Why not? I guess we don't "look" or "act" like what people expect gamers to "look" and "act" like? Can you tell a person is a gamer just by looking at them? Of course not. It is crap like this, written this time in a videogaming magazine, that helps perpetuate this nonsense.
[/rant]