Heh, I never noticed that.
I am not sure if this was intended or not. If it is, the name is misleading for someone coming from D&D 3.x. Calling it "defenseless" might make more sense.
It's not misleading for someone coming from 3E, it's misleading for someone that speaks English. Defenseless isn't all that good either since you can defend yourself pretty darned well, the penalty of granting combat advantage is very small and hardly what I'd call defenseless. How about... Vulnerable.
Main Entry:help·less
Pronunciation: \ˈhel-pləs; Southern often ˈhep-ləs also ˈheəp-\ Function:adjective Date:before 12th century
1: lacking protection or support
2 a: marked by an inability to act or react <the crowd looked on in helpless horror — Current Biography> b: not able to be controlled or restrained <helpless laughter>
Main Entry:vul·ner·a·blePronunciation: \ˈvəl-n(ə-)rə-bəl, ˈvəl-nər-bəl\ Function:adjective Etymology:Late Latin vulnerabilis, from Latin vulnerare to wound, from vulner-, vulnus wound; probably akin to Latin vellere to pluck, Greek oulē woundDate:1605
1 : capable of being physically or emotionally wounded
2 : open to attack or damage
3 : liable to increased penalties but entitled to increased bonuses after winning a game in contract bridge
Last edited: