This is nonsense, they are using Silverlight for now, that does not prevent them from developing other UI. Most of the application will not need to be recoded since that part sits on the server. The UI can be a native iPhone app as easily as a Silverlight component or an HTML 5 UIGiven that they're locked to Silverlight, at least for now, they would be lying if they promised anything with respect to mobile devices.
Given that they're locked to Silverlight, at least for now, they would be lying if they promised anything with respect to mobile devices.
Given that they're locked to Silverlight, at least for now, they would be lying if they promised anything with respect to mobile devices.
And this ladies and gentlemen is a text-book example of flawed logic and broken reasoning.
Cows are green, grass is white indeed.
Given that they're locked to Silverlight, at least for now, they would be lying if they promised anything with respect to mobile devices.
This is nonsense, they are using Silverlight for now, that does not prevent them from developing other UI. Most of the application will not need to be recoded since that part sits on the server. The UI can be a native iPhone app as easily as a Silverlight component or an HTML 5 UI
I reckon they went Silverlight because it filtted in with existing expertiese and they were in a hurry. Once they have rolled out a decent amount of functionality there is every incentive and little reason not to go back and create clients in different platforms to fill in the gaps.
Here's what's stopping them: Business acumen.
It wouldn't offer any advantage and only serve to alienate a large part of the customer base.
(and WotC definitely wouldn't bother with Blackberry).
How many Red boxes do you think will go to old gamers compared to younger and new games for xmas?