Should that be your goal, I don't perceive you are demonstrating that well. To my eyes you come across as peevish and divisive. Poor writing can certainly be an issue. Your insistence that the wording is vague to the point of multiple valid interpretations seems to me as purely argumentative. If the RAW is that vague, it should be fairly straight-forward to determine the RAI.Indeed, it's a bit a question of principle at least on my part, of people trying to impose specific views on an open edition like 5e. They can do whatever they want in their campaign, but trying, without any support from the actual rules, to claim to have the only interpretation of the Holy RAW is something that I have a problem with. Free your imagination, free your game.
Not that you're the only one with an axe to grind.