And the knights are not raping the women. They are kidnapping them and educating them for sexual freedom. The women can choose among the many knights of the order. It is just chastity that is forbidden.
Although I thought that gamers were a leg up on the rest of society. I really did.
The order regularly kidnaps beautiful women who would otherwise have been caged in the prison of chastity. The women are educated (and brainwashed if necessary)
...
What can be said about the morality of this controversial order? That, dear reader, is for you to judge.
What do you think?
And the knights are not raping the women. They are kidnapping them and educating them for sexual freedom. The women can choose among the many knights of the order. It is just chastity that is forbidden.
The symbol of this knighthood is a nymph and a succubus making out so that should have shed some light on where I stand.
In real life I support gay marriage, even though I think homosexuality is unnatural (not lesbianism mind you, just homosexuality.)
In the game, this organization would frown upon men having sexual relationships with one another although women would be fully free and encouraged to do so.
I did not say full freedom, I said full sexual freedom. Sexual freedom does not include chastity.
Where to start. First the idea that choosing to be chaste is some how unnatural is just ludicrous.
There are a lot of reasons people choose to be chaste here are just a few.
Elite athletes often forgo sex while they are training.
Some people prefer to have sex only when they are in a committed relationship.
Some people are grieving the loss of a loved one and don't desire sex with a new person at this time.
Some woman don't desire sex for awhile after the birth of a child.
Some view abstinence as a way to get closer to god. Or to improve the mind like some monks.
So your knights would force woman to have sex even if they have a reason for choosing abstinence like they want to concentrate on their spirituality or becoming better warriors? Or they want to to only have sex with a man they love or a woman for that matter?
And if the woman didn't want it she is not allowed to say no she has to have sex the only choice she has is with who. And if she does not then she is coerced with magic. And you can't see that is a form of rape.
You are right these are some evil SOBs and there should be a bunch of paladins in the world ready to do battle and take this group down.
I don't have an issue with a group like this in a DnD world as long as you portray them as the evil folk they are.
I find it disturbing that you really can't see that what you are saying is not only extremely offensive to people who believe in sexual freedom but a little scary as well.
I can understand because of your youth that you might not have a lot of experience with woman. Let me explain something to you about how some woman view sex. For some woman sex outside of a relationship is not something they enjoy. For a lot of woman sex is both a physical and emotional thing as well. The way woman's bodies are built they don't have as easy a time reaching climax as men do. Part of this has to do with the fact that enjoying sex for woman has nothing to do with conception.
For woman a lot of trust in their partner and being able to relax enough to enjoy sex is needed to reach climax which is kind of hard to do with someone you don't know.
Your knighthood has taken love and trust out of the equation for these woman. These woman would not view these men as liberators but as monsters.