Let's Talk About Metacurrency

Responding to the OP:
I like metacurrency for the PCs, but they need to be earned. IMC, I give each Player a "Luck Point" for showing up to the game on time; Luck Points can be used as Inspiration or for a slightly stronger effect. They get 1 "Fate Point" per level or major storyline completion; Fate Points save your life, or allow you to "edit" the world. And we use "Inspiration Cards" - you can forfeit the standard reroll rule for a unique one-time special effect described by the card.

I hate the idea of metacurrency for the GM, because it promotes the idea that the GM is "against" the Players. As the GM, I'm providing a story and a setting, and then letting the players run amok in it. I'm not out to get them, I'm there to adjudicate the results of their actions. If they figure out there's a medusa in the basement, they can avoid it, drop the building on it, face it in battle (with or without mirrors and whatnot), report it to more powerful authorities, flee in terror, whatever. If they miss every clue about the medusa, and wander unprepared into the basement, well... I don't need to spend "metacurrency" to trigger the medusa, or hide clues, or prevent the PCs from leaving the area, or thwart their first two ideas for collapsing the building, or whatever. We are playing a TTRPG (D&D 5.5e in this case), not "Descent" or similar "5v1" tabletop boardgame.

Likewise, if a battle is going too easily for the PCs... then it goes easily. I'm not throwing in 1d6 extra skeletons because I have a Threat token. If there are 5 skeletons in that battlefield, they are/were always there, for the reason I put them there - and they activate or don't because of the reason/story that I defined - like "desecration of a gravestone (perhaps from an AoE spell)", "a radiant attack kills a someone within the grounds", or "any necromantic spell being cast has a 10% chance per spell level of awakening them". Now, I know the PC warlock alternates between eldritch blast and sacred flame, so there's a good chance that trigger #2 will happen; he also likes wall of fire, so trigger #1 might too. Chill touch is the only necromantic spell the players have, and it's not used much (thanks to 5.5e's version being TOUCH range again!), so trigger #3 might never happen from the PCs. On the other hand, the bandits have a dark cleric with them, and he has a few necromantic spells (spiritual weapon interestingly having the potential to be either!). The point is: no GM metacurrency required or desired. I'm not spending 5 Threat to drop a dragon on them - there is no dragon in the area, no matter how much metacurrency I want to spend!
 

log in or register to remove this ad



That is stretching the definition of "exceptional" well beyond the breaking point. Though it is pretty strained for most of the others as well. I don't think "distantly related to some nobility" is particularly exceptional.

The Numenoreans were so exceptional, they lived for centuries. They were potent enough to fight side-by-side with the first, most powerful of the elves, against Sauron's Boss, Morgoth, in the war that banished Morgoth to the Void. For their efforts and suffering, the "angels" of Middle Earth raised the island from the sea for them, so they could live closer to what amounts to the Garden of Eden.

While Aragorn was many generations removed... he was 87 years old (and in the prime of his life at that age) when he met the Hobbits in Bree... he's not just "distantly related to some nobility".

I'm sorry, but while not as bad as some paint him, Tolkien wasn't all that egalitarian. In his writings, some men are just better than others.

For example most exceptional thing about Frodo is being related to Bilbo

Ah, but Bilbo is the great, great grandson of Bandobras "the Bullroarer" Took, a hobbit so big he could ride a horse, and who personally averted a goblin invasion of the Shire at the Battle of Greenfields, by taking the head off the goblin leader Golfimul with a wooden club... and inventing the game of golf in the process.

In the text, Bilbo and Frodo's adventurous tendencies are repeatedly ascribed to their Tookishness, which connects them back to Bandobras (from who the FR gets "the halfling god "Brandobaris", btw).

Pippin is another Took. Merry is the first son of the Master of Buckland, of the line of the first Thane of the Shire.

Gimli a direct descendant of King Nain II, and thus a direct descendant of Durin the Deathless, first of the dwarves built by the angelic being Aule.

Legolas is, of course, son of Thranduil, King of the Elves of Mirkwood.

And, of course, Gandalf is an angelic being.

The only member of the Fellowship who has a job and works for a living is Sam Gamgee.

The fact that all these guys have such a story to them is because Tolkien thought this important. Folks get so tangled up in orcs that they often don't notice that Tolkien was laying down some significant bloodline-based classism.
 

The Numenoreans were so exceptional, they lived for centuries. They were potent enough to fight side-by-side with the first, most powerful of the elves, against Sauron's Boss, Morgoth, in the war that banished Morgoth to the Void. For their efforts and suffering, the "angels" of Middle Earth raised the island from the sea for them, so they could live closer to what amounts to the Garden of Eden.

While Aragorn was many generations removed... he was 87 years old (and in the prime of his life at that age) when he met the Hobbits in Bree... he's not just "distantly related to some nobility".

I'm sorry, but while not as bad as some paint him, Tolkien wasn't all that egalitarian. In his writings, some men are just better than others.

Obviously. This is not any sort of a secret. And of course no one is denying that the King who returns, Aragorn Elessar, special even among the Dúnedain is not exceptional. Of course he is, he is an archetypal chosen one.

Ah, but Bilbo is the great, great grandson of Bandobras "the Bullroarer" Took, a hobbit so big he could ride a horse, and who personally averted a goblin invasion of the Shire at the Battle of Greenfields, by taking the head off the goblin leader Golfimul with a wooden club... and inventing the game of golf in the process.

In the text, Bilbo and Frodo's adventurous tendencies are repeatedly ascribed to their Tookishness, which connects them back to Bandobras (from who the FR gets "the halfling god "Brandobaris", btw).

Pippin is another Took. Merry is the first son of the Master of Buckland, of the line of the first Thane of the Shire.

Gimli a direct descendant of King Nain II, and thus a direct descendant of Durin the Deathless, first of the dwarves built by the angelic being Aule.

Legolas is, of course, son of Thranduil, King of the Elves of Mirkwood.

And, of course, Gandalf is an angelic being.

The only member of the Fellowship who has a job and works for a living is Sam Gamgee.

Yes, and when I read about the Hundred Years War, almost all of the principal actors are some sort of royals and aristocrats! Of course people in a world with medieval sensibilities that are invited into an important meeting about the fate of the world are likely to be some sort of aristocrats. This does not make them exceptional, this is perfectly normal. Most of the characters in Game of Thrones are aristocrats as well, but most of them are not really exceptional. Targaryens might be, the rest, nope. Same is true with Tolkien. Aragorn is of course special, as is the literal demigod on a mission, Gandalf. The rest are really not.

The fact that all these guys have such a story to them is because Tolkien thought this important. Folks get so tangled up in orcs that they often don't notice that Tolkien was laying down some significant bloodline-based classism.

Of course he was. Like no one hearing the talk of "lesser men" ruining Gondor cannot be oblivious to that. But you also overextend the claim beyond absurd. You were literally claiming that Sam is special because he -checks notes- "does not live in a city." And whilst Aragorn is the archetypical chosen one, this is already partly deconstructed in the book. His return is certainly depicted as unambiguously good thing, but this mighty chosen one with the ancient royal blood ultimately ends up acting as a distraction so that the hobbits can finish the job.
 


Since everything I place during prep is done in accordance with my judgement on what makes sense to be there in the setting as a high priority, I don't really see it as meta. You are welcome to disagree. In any case, luck mechanics and other meta-currencies are a different beast, and that's what this thread is about, not whether or not GM prep counts as "meta".
I have vastly different TTRPG objectives from you so I'm quite surprised we share the opinion that the fiction exists outside the DM and can thereby dictates what the DM does.
 

The Numenoreans were so exceptional, they lived for centuries. They were potent enough to fight side-by-side with the first, most powerful of the elves, against Sauron's Boss, Morgoth, in the war that banished Morgoth to the Void. For their efforts and suffering, the "angels" of Middle Earth raised the island from the sea for them, so they could live closer to what amounts to the Garden of Eden.

While Aragorn was many generations removed... he was 87 years old (and in the prime of his life at that age) when he met the Hobbits in Bree... he's not just "distantly related to some nobility".

I'm sorry, but while not as bad as some paint him, Tolkien wasn't all that egalitarian. In his writings, some men are just better than others.



Ah, but Bilbo is the great, great grandson of Bandobras "the Bullroarer" Took, a hobbit so big he could ride a horse, and who personally averted a goblin invasion of the Shire at the Battle of Greenfields, by taking the head off the goblin leader Golfimul with a wooden club... and inventing the game of golf in the process.

In the text, Bilbo and Frodo's adventurous tendencies are repeatedly ascribed to their Tookishness, which connects them back to Bandobras (from who the FR gets "the halfling god "Brandobaris", btw).

Pippin is another Took. Merry is the first son of the Master of Buckland, of the line of the first Thane of the Shire.

Gimli a direct descendant of King Nain II, and thus a direct descendant of Durin the Deathless, first of the dwarves built by the angelic being Aule.

Legolas is, of course, son of Thranduil, King of the Elves of Mirkwood.

And, of course, Gandalf is an angelic being.

The only member of the Fellowship who has a job and works for a living is Sam Gamgee.

The fact that all these guys have such a story to them is because Tolkien thought this important. Folks get so tangled up in orcs that they often don't notice that Tolkien was laying down some significant bloodline-based classism.
No one mess with Umbran's Tolkien scholarship. Angry hobbits with nobbly clubs will pour out of every nearby thread to treat you badly.
 

I have vastly different TTRPG objectives from you so I'm quite surprised we share the opinion that the fiction exists outside the DM and can thereby dictates what the DM does.
Most of us have vastly different goals than Micah, it is what it is. I appreciate his play style, but it's very niche.
 

I have vastly different TTRPG objectives from you so I'm quite surprised we share the opinion that the fiction exists outside the DM and can thereby dictates what the DM does.
where does that fiction that dictates what the DM does in prep come from? Are you playing in an existing setting like FR? If not, then it was the DM that made up the setting, so at that point all this is is consistency
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top