Egres said:But you can see just like me that Unarmed Strikes aren't listed as melee weapons.
Don't you wonder why?
They aren't handheld weapons.
They aren't listed as melee weapons.
They aren't melee weapons.
Light, One-Handed, and Two-Handed Melee Weapons: This designation is a measure of how much effort it takes to wield a weapon in combat. It indicates whether a melee weapon, when wielded by a character of the weapon’s size category, is considered a light weapon, a one-handed weapon, or a two-handed weapon.
Light: A light weapon is easier to use in one’s off hand than a one-handed weapon is, and it can be used while grappling. A light weapon is used in one hand. Add the wielder’s Strength bonus (if any) to damage rolls for melee attacks with a light weapon if it’s used in the primary hand, or one-half the wielder’s Strength bonus if it’s used in the off hand. Using two hands to wield a light weapon gives no advantage on damage; the Strength bonus applies as though the weapon were held in the wielder’s primary hand only.
An unarmed strike is always considered a light weapon.
1) Nowhere you did quote a part where the PHB states that they are melee weapons.Lasher Dragon said:No, they aren't handheld weapons
Yes, they are listed as melee weapons -
Patryn ,I'm not wrong, face that.Patryn of Elvenshae said:Egres, you're wrong. Face it.
An unarmed strike is a weapon. It even appears in the table of weapons, here:
http://www.wizards.com/d20/files/v35/Equipment.rtf
It's on table "Weapons," under "Simple Weapons," under "Unarmed Attacks."
It is on the same table as a sword or an axe.
An unarmed strike *is* a weapon, and a melee weapon at that.
Egres said:Unarmed Strikes aren't melee weapons.
Egres said:An Unarmed Strike is listed as a simple weapon, but not a melee one.