Ltheb Silverfrond said:U_K:
Table 3-1: Portfolios notes 'synergistic' portfolios? What does this mean? Does it grant a benifit, or is it simply 'these two make a lot of sense together'. Either way, this should probably be noted; I spent about an hour scanning the book for mention of it.
Also, I believe Synergistic is spelled wrong on the table itself. (Spelled correctly in the paragraph above it though)
Sorry to hear it.Upper_Krust said:Hey guys!
Sorry for being fairly absent of late, just had a really dreadful past few days, broke up with my girlfriend and I'm really deflated by the whole episode. I'll try not to let it distract me too much, been burying my head in Ascension, but having a lot of trouble concentrating. I'm sure many of you have went through similar experiences so no need to clutter this thread with any messages of sympathy...I'll be okay.
I was planning on instigating some sort of synergistic relationship between certain portfolios because they go well together. But I think that may be one layer of complexity too far. I have left it on the table as I was still wondering if I could figure it out. It will probably be erased in the final version if I cannot think of an appropriate solution.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.