Saracenus
Always In School Gamer
“Let me nerdsplain that to you” is the vibe I am getting…Sometimes you aren't asking for advice. Sometimes you just want to chat about a thing.
“Let me nerdsplain that to you” is the vibe I am getting…Sometimes you aren't asking for advice. Sometimes you just want to chat about a thing.
It isn't for everyone, but try a rules light, more "thespian" game like InSPECTREs or Dread. InSPECTREs is more like a party game and the rules are easy to pick up they keep engagement high. But it does require the GM to be comfortable with improvisation (but on the plus side requires very little prep). It also requires players who are willing to get into it and does seem to be liked by more extraverted players. Dread is best for suspense/horror, but can work with more beer and pretzle, slapstick scenarios as well. They have also published a variety of variants based off of Dread for different genres. The PDFs are not expensive. The Jenga Tower helps keep people paying attention, but it won't be fun for people with hand dexterity challenges.I actually have those starter sets (and physical dice) from a game years ago. Never ran those particular adventures though.
I do have a VTT game. This is/was just my only in person game. I'd miss not using any of my painted minis, gaming table, etc. Plus VTTs, well, I've never played in a game that seemed to engage the players. It's just sort of "sit there and wait" and kill time looking at social media.
That's actually scary. 4 out of 7 judges took that position.Boneless chicken wings can have bones
I find it more surprising that 3 of 7 didn't. It's a long held legal principle.That's actually scary. 4 out of 7 judges took that position.
I find it more surprising that 3 of 7 didn't. It's a long held legal principle.
This is the sort of focus on inconsequential detail I come here for! Bravo! Nerds rule!But "boneless wing" is not a cooking style, as is clear by the way that "wings" and "boneless wings" use the same cooking style. The only difference is an expectation on whether there might be bone in there. That expectation is how you base a decision on whether you order one or the other!
I don't care how long-held the legal principle is, if you have to misrepresent the language to get it to apply.
This is the sort of focus on inconsequential detail I come here for! Bravo! Nerds rule!
Yeah, that's true. I should probably read the articles before posting wiseass comments, but that would require me to learn to read.I think the guy who had to go to the hospital with a lacerated esophagus doesn't find it "inconsequential".