aland
First Post
D&D can only be discussed like this:
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211902
this
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211822
and this
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=211850
Recently, in order to popularize my signature, I muddled in some foreign forums. Finding no topic interested, I brought forward some old stuff. Yet however I tried, the discussion about D&D3R always seemed to be centered around combat, like a board game or miniature. No threads could bring along debate concerning of role-playing. So how DARE you all claim that D&D3R is not a game which emphasizes fighting instead of role-playing into extreme?! There’s no sense about the nine alignments, neither are those role-playing addicted players satisfied when dealing with D&D3R. They even considered to play it with E6, where E6 means to cap level 6 as the top of the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Planesinger
and know Alter self, +6 AC. only wiz/sor, brd and asn know the spell, it is a good spell.
No it's not. It is a broken spell, and I doubt any sane DM with a bit of experience would allow everything with it
See, too high a value could have made a foreigner remark it a “broken idea”, so why can’t I say you all are broken, and inferior to those foreigners?
My signature is still in effect, yet where’s YOUR achievements? Years ago I wanted to make you all level up to the level of a role-playing game designer, but instead you pulled me down into this so called “broken” area. I am so outraged. So let’s see who goes further and higher!
=============================================================
I recently read this post in a Chinese RPG forum, posted by the very HIERARCH icestone, who claimed (and argued, bravely, confirmedly and furiously) to be the very first one discovering that monk could use two weapon fighting in the rules in China and in CORE two weapon fighting is the strongest and deals the highest damage.
http://bbs.ntrpg.org/showthread.php?t=3157
And I just kept wondering why would someone post in a sub-forum discussing rules while expect debates about role-playing. Full of questions and wonders, I translated this post and, since all the links are related to this sub-forum, maybe it’s best to post it here and “draw on the wisdom of the mass” to get a clear idea of what our HIERARCH is talking about?
Oh, and the “you” in this translation means those experienced D&D players who denied his/her claim and refused to admit two weapon fighting is the strongest in the CORE, equally bravely and confirmedly.