Rystil Arden
First Post
Did she buy that or was it Disguise Self? 5'4'' 118 lbs 22 years old.Bront said:
Shards of Memory: OOC
- Thread starter Rystil Arden
- Start date
Rystil Arden
First Post
She has expensive clothes and luxury items, plus a whole bunch of cash. Probably just right for a character her level (that much money is a huge amount for anyone but a noble to be carrying around, but she has no magic items, except her Legendary Item, which doesn't count against wealth.)Bront said:
Bront
The man with the probe
Cool. What's her legendary item? What's she built up so far? I'm sure she has something.
And remember, standard wealth means nothing in your world, since it's all funky and stuff. Should I just equip her reasonably?
And I assume she has arcane spell failure problems?
And remember, standard wealth means nothing in your world, since it's all funky and stuff. Should I just equip her reasonably?
And I assume she has arcane spell failure problems?
Rystil Arden
First Post
She isn't equipped reasonably--she has tons of cash (~2000 in Rowaini gold and gems), some nice dresses, and more-or-less no adventuring equipmentBront said:
Her Legendary Item is a Heartstone locket of her mother's. It casts Cure Minor Wounds on her if she ever goes unconscious in order to stabilise her with its own action, once a day.She doesn't have ASF problems because she doesn't wear armour
Bront
The man with the probe
I ment she would if she went shoppingRystil Arden said:She isn't equipped reasonably--she has tons of cash (~2000 in Rowaini gold and gems), some nice dresses, and more-or-less no adventuring equipment
She doesn't have ASF problems because she doesn't wear armour
Which it looks like she needs to do.
She does have the cloak or whatever item it was though, right?
unleashed
First Post
I must say that's an unusual way to do spell damage in my experience. I've always thought that if you cast a spell which damages multiple creatures, like cone of cold, fireball, lightning bolt, etc., you should roll the damage dice once. This in effect says that you've managed to weave a specific amount of magical energy into that particular casting, with the only modifiers to damage dealt being on the defensive end (saving throw success or failure, abilities like evasion, resistance, immunity, etc.). Plus of course when you're blasting a large number of foes, the sheer number of dice that might need to be rolled just gets silly.Rystil Arden said:
Your thoughts?Rystil Arden
First Post
I like rolling separately for each enemy. It helps prevent an all-or-nothing effect "Oops, that Fireball got 9 on 6d6...And half of them saved and took 4" or "Huzzah! That's 30 on 6d6!"unleashed said:I must say that's an unusual way to do spell damage in my experience. I've always thought that if you cast a spell which damages multiple creatures, like cone of cold, fireball, lightning bolt, etc., you should roll the damage dice once. This in effect says that you've managed to weave a specific amount of magical energy into that particular casting, with the only modifiers to damage dealt being on the defensive end (saving throw success or failure, abilities like evasion, resistance, immunity, etc.). Plus of course when you're blasting a large number of foes, the sheer number of dice that might need to be rolled just gets silly.
I've been rolling it this way for the entirity of all my PbPs and you haven't commented until now
