That's fair, but tbh, that makes the map feel weirder to me, like Federation space should look more fragmented. Like, Bajor used to be on the periphery of the Federation, so I'd almost expect it to be a bit of an island away from the rest.Don't forget that the burn reduced the Federation from more than 350 worlds down to just 38. By the time of Starfleet Academy it is back up to 60+, but that's still a much smaller volume of space to enclose than it would have been in previous eras.
Like most of Star Trek over the years, if you peer too closely . . . plot holes, inconsistencies, and utter nonsense will jump out at you.I was ready for the mom to die, so we could move on from the tedium of that plot. I realize most won't agree.... But how many times are we going to watch his same inner conflict over and over? Watch him break all the rules with no real consequences, over and over?
I agree with all that I too was never able to remember all the character names in Discovery.I’m curious what people think of the various characters. I think for me I’m sort of struggling to make out notable personality traits in some. It’s Star Trek, I’m not expecting deep character work, just a “Spock is the logical one, McCoy is the cynical one” level of character.
Sam — clear personality, ultra cheerful and naive
Caleb — blandly mcblanderson (does he have a personality other than sulk?)
Genesis — again, struggling to work out what they’re doing with her. Is she uptight rules person? Overachiever?
Jaden — his personality is “speaks in a slow deep voice and is very boring”. They early on dropped references to him being a pacifist but that hasn’t really manifested much in any way.
Glitter-puke-boy — was a jerk, but now he isn’t. Not sure what he is now.
Betazoid girl — no character traits I can discern.
I get that this is just s1. And at least I know all their names, unlike Discovery. So it’s way ahead on that front. No wait, I don’t know what glitter-puke-boy’s name is. Or the Betazoid girl.
Despite this I’m still liking this. It’s better than Discovery. It’s not as good as Strange New Worlds.
Yep this is where I'm at as well. And of course most first seasons of star trek haven't been the hottest, always takes time to find their footing (I think SNW is actually the best "season 1" of ST, it knocked it out of the park from day one imo).Despite this I’m still liking this. It’s better than Discovery. It’s not as good as Strange New Worlds.
We only watched the first two seasons of Discovery, and are lukewarm on this series, and I'm trying to put my finger why this new version of Star Trek doesn't feel much like Star Trek to me. I'm thinking it's that Star Trek was always science fiction with some action elements, whereas this new version of the franchise feels like action with some science fiction elements. It's not driven by ideas, but by more conventional action plot hooks.
It feels a lot smaller.
I would have to agree and I think it's because they're trying to shore-up an aging fan base, by appealing to a new audience. There's also the element that when you only have 10-ish episodes to get the story out, you don't get the sort of depth and character development that you do with 20+ episodes. You just don't have the time for "filler" episodes that really let you get to know the characters. "Strange New Worlds" felt the most like older Trek to me, out of the new stuff. "Discovery", nothing at all like it. "Academy" is somewhere in between.We only watched the first two seasons of Discovery, and are lukewarm on this series, and I'm trying to put my finger why this new version of Star Trek doesn't feel much like Star Trek to me. I'm thinking it's that Star Trek was always science fiction with some action elements, whereas this new version of the franchise feels like action with some science fiction elements. It's not driven by ideas, but by more conventional action plot hooks.
It feels a lot smaller.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.