Hard sci-fi, as I understand it, is a type of sci-fi that tries to make the science credible and does it's best to adhere to actual scientific concepts with some level of accuracy. Obviously, sci-fi generally can't be a slave to actual scientific accuracy since some story concepts may be needed that may not be scientifically accurate but are necessary story elements. The Expanse novels and show are a good example of hard sci-fi, when possible they strive for accuracy but when technology like the protomolecule is introduced science goes out the window. Star Trek is more traditional sci-fi where scientific accuracy isn't really relevant to the story but tries to be somewhat internally consistent but certainly isn't "hard sci-fi". Science fantasy is some thing like Star Wars, because it's has things like space wizards. I would argue that just because Star Trek isn't space fantasy that doesn't make it hard sci-fi.Hard sci-fi only in the sense that it is (usually) actually sci-fi in a world where a lot of space fantasy gets called sci-fi.
Hard sci-fi, as I understand it, is a type of sci-fi that tries to make the science credible and does it's best to adhere to actual scientific concepts with some level of accuracy.
Sure, language and concepts change over time, and I have no problem with that which is why I find it helpful to provide a definition so others know where I am approaching something from. However, if the definitions become too squishy they become useless. If Star Trek is hard sci-fi compared to Star Wars does that make The Martian harder sci-fi compared to both? Or is The Martian still just hard sci-fi relatively even though Star Trek is too?No term goes unwarped by use. Originally "Low fantasy" meant "fantasy that is set within our real world" and "high fantasy" meant "fantasy set in a different, fictional setting". But that's not how the word is generally used now.
So, yeah, since there are things out there like Star Wars, that blur the lines, folks wind up using the term in a highly relative way, in whcih their baseline is so "soft" a sci-fi that the "hard" is still very squishy.
So, I have thoughts.
We are now three episodes in. Personally, I thought the most recent episode was the worst of the three, but it was still a good Star Trek episode. And that's when it hit me...
This is the Trek I've been waiting for. I love prestige TV. I love season-long arcs. But ... you know what else I love? THIS.
It's good. It's optimistic. It's what we aspire to. And each episode is mostly self-contained. And the cast and crew is ... enjoyable. The show it serious, but it never takes itself too seriously. And I genuinely like the characters! And the various crew members are getting time so that I get to know them! And then there's the whole Pike/Spock dynamic, which is working (not to mention the Chapel/Spock dynamic, which is fun).
It's as if they crossed the best of TNG and TOS. Which is high praise ... and I hope they keep it up.
I still like Discovery, which genuinely got better the last two seasons. And Picard is like a warm cup of Earl Grey- soothing .... Yeah, I know the last season had its rough spots, but it was totally worth it for the scene at the end with Q and Jean Luc (that's all I'm going to say).
But BNW is exactly what I needed.
(I am glad that they seem to be moving away from the whole, "Pike is preoccupied with how he is going to die" thing, because that doesn't seem to add much to the gestalt of the program.)
And until it came along, the best source of TOS style Star Trek wasn't Star Trek at all, but "The Orville." Now episodic Trek, with a moral, is finally back.So, I have thoughts.
We are now three episodes in. Personally, I thought the most recent episode was the worst of the three, but it was still a good Star Trek episode. And that's when it hit me...
This is the Trek I've been waiting for. I love prestige TV. I love season-long arcs. But ... you know what else I love? THIS.
It's good. It's optimistic. It's what we aspire to. And each episode is mostly self-contained. And the cast and crew is ... enjoyable. The show it serious, but it never takes itself too seriously. And I genuinely like the characters! And the various crew members are getting time so that I get to know them! And then there's the whole Pike/Spock dynamic, which is working (not to mention the Chapel/Spock dynamic, which is fun).
And the funny thing is that we, who watched the original series, know more about that than does Pike. Don't know if I should spoiler that, in a spoiler thread, for those who have never seen TOSIt's as if they crossed the best of TNG and TOS. Which is high praise ... and I hope they keep it up.
I still like Discovery, which genuinely got better the last two seasons. And Picard is like a warm cup of Earl Grey- soothing .... Yeah, I know the last season had its rough spots, but it was totally worth it for the scene at the end with Q and Jean Luc (that's all I'm going to say).
But BNW is exactly what I needed.
(I am glad that they seem to be moving away from the whole, "Pike is preoccupied with how he is going to die" thing, because that doesn't seem to add much to the gestalt of the program.)