The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[Snarf Zagyg]

I think that WoTC should only publish books, that are 100% lore, that all start by saying, "NPCs are different. You, the PC, are special."

Maybe have a thread about that? Seems like a good idea!

 

[Cadence]

I'm imagining a time travel/alternate history story where Emily Post and the internet temporally overlap. (So, sci-fi?)

 

[Umbran]

I'm imagining a time travel/alternate history story where Emily Post and the internet temporally overlap. (So, sci-fi?)

The term "netiquette" is not new. But folks always think it is about how others behave.

 

[Cadence]

The term "netiquette" is not new. But folks always think it is about how others behave.

That's how everything on the internet works isn't it?

Oh. :-(

 

[darjr]

Hahah! Fool ya!

I haven’t worn pants in weeks!

 

[BookTenTiger]

"4e did X, and 4e failed, so X = failure" is such a logical fallacy that it makes my head spin.

Whatever else you think of 4e, there are a lot of things it did that did not lead to its failure. Cantrips, giving Clerics more to do, awesome monsters... It's silly to use 4e as a bogeyman to judge how others play the game.

"Have you, or have you not, had sympathies towards 4th Edition D&D? Just answer the question!"

 

[billd91]

"Have you, or have you not, had sympathies towards 4th Edition D&D? Just answer the question!"

You're xxxdamn right, I ordered the code red!



wait, what were we talking about here?

 

[Cadence]

"4e did X, and 4e failed, so X = failure" is such a logical fallacy that it makes my head spin.

Whatever else you think of 4e, there are a lot of things it did that did not lead to its failure. Cantrips, giving Clerics more to do, awesome monsters... It's silly to use 4e as a bogeyman to judge how others play the game.

"Have you, or have you not, had sympathies towards 4th Edition D&D? Just answer the question!"

So, the bogeyman can be good too? Did I read that right?

::ducks for cover:::

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

"4e did X, and 4e failed, so X = failure" is such a logical fallacy that it makes my head spin.

Whatever else you think of 4e, there are a lot of things it did that did not lead to its failure. Cantrips, giving Clerics more to do, awesome monsters... It's silly to use 4e as a bogeyman to judge how others play the game.

Uh... there's a lot people say about 3e ... but the one thing I've never heard is, "Hey guys, the Clerics in that edition really, really sucked. Do you know what the worst, least-powerful class that had nothing to do was? The CODZILLA! Thank goodness 4e rectified those weak-azz Clerics and gave them something to do!"

...but maybe I missed out on some of the discourse?

 

[Cadence]

But how do you eat pizza while you're driving in the city?