Wait, is Two Six the new Six Seven????Makes sense. I mean, why rewrite the Constitution when I can just say "L'etat, c'est moi!"
Same principle can definitely apply to my DMing.
Wait, is Two Six the new Six Seven????Makes sense. I mean, why rewrite the Constitution when I can just say "L'etat, c'est moi!"
Same principle can definitely apply to my DMing.
No to @TwoSix .
Why are you playing with 'some rando' in the first place?
Please don't run the same game for life. That's even worse. Run lots of games, in lots of systems. Make more friends and play with them too. Just always remember the center of the game is the table, not the setting notes. Kumbaya!I am not going to run the exact same paint-by-numbers campaign for life because someone decides that D&D can only be one style of game.
I assume he is just trolling.
If we can make it a meme for all toddlers and people who write 200 page setting bibles, I'm all in.Wait, is Two Six the new Six Seven????
Have you never moved? Had players drop out because they moved or had a kid or some other reason? Randos are just potential friends I don't know yet.
Exactly. I've been actively conciliatory on this board for decades now. I'm just taking a little break from couching all of my thoughts in digestible platitudes.Yes, and that's fine. With some clarification I see now that hes just bluntly expressing his opinion without attempting to cushion it as one normally would in online discussion.
Which is fine. I can and did do the same. "No, its false." The 'to me' being implied and the same behavior hes going for.
Which is fine, it will all end in moderation eventually.
I agree in general, but in this discussion I assume that is because everyone insisting that not allowing a tortle is bad DMing is not really all that interested in playing one in the first place, so they draw a blank.If somebody wants to play a particular aspect as a class or a race but can't tell you why they wanna play that class or race either: They're not being honest or they really don't know why they're so steadfast on it and shouldn't be so steadfast on it.
There's a Warcraft game to play and D&D isn't Warcraft. I gather you're a die hard horde player. I'm the same way with alliance.My 'introduction to D&D' path starts in Warcraft 3. So you can imagine the shock when I come over the D&D side and people say "Orcs aren't playable. They're always evil" as a setting feature when I've come from basically the trend setter for 'yeah orcs can be good, its the individual people who are good or evil'. Anything that tries to make orcs always evil is going to sit poor with me and, well, you know my views on alignment to begin with.