D&D 5E Thread topic most likely to be first to reach 10+ pages of argument

Thread topic most likely to be first to reach 10 pages or more of argument

  • The Problem with Race in D&D

    Votes: 34 54.8%
  • The Problem with Alignment in D&D

    Votes: 18 29.0%
  • Are [insert orcs or drow] evil?

    Votes: 17 27.4%
  • Grognards Don't Get It

    Votes: 8 12.9%
  • TSR3 / Justin LaNasa

    Votes: 8 12.9%
  • Other (explain)

    Votes: 12 19.4%
  • Why [insert edition of D&D] is better/worse

    Votes: 6 9.7%


log in or register to remove this ad




I voted race but also "Other" (don't give me multiple options if you don't want them used!), and that other would definitely be something something 4E. In particular anything which invited discussion of 4E in general, rather than getting people to play it now or whatever. Even if it was "reminisce about your good times in 4E" but they forgot to put a + then I guarantee a bunch of "wits" (there should be an extra t on that) would descend on the thread to moan and stereotype.

If you really wanted a nuclear detonation, how about "Why did people dislike 4E?" from some new poster. The only way that would end would be with a bunch of red text and Umbran dragging a number of us unconscious to the stockade.

I'm just waiting for 7E so I can get people who hated 4E saying "Well yeah 4E wasn't great but it was a lot less bad than this bloody 7E for Zoomer kids!".
 


Perhaps there should be a distinction between long threads which keep arguing about the original topic, and long threads that lurch off-topic until at page 80-ish people are arguing about what the definition of "is" is.

And don't forget anything with "martials" in the title.
 




Remove ads

Top