szilard
First Post
Asmor said:That's really not that balanced at all. For example, 1 point per level is huge to a fighter, who's probably lucky to be getting 2 points per level as it is. My last fighter had an 8 intelligence, so this would have doubled his skill points. A rogue, on the other hand, is probably getting at least 10 points per level, so 1 more is a tiny upgrade. Not balanced.
Arguably, skill points are more useful to those classes that get more of them. Also, note that the Rogue will have more choices as to what to do with that skill point than the Fighter will (since they have more class skills).
And one of the things I really don't like about all of these suggestions of just adding a flat bonus regardless of the class is that it's just not the least bit flavorful.
Eh. YMMV.
Why are Half-orcs better barbarians? Because they get more skill points. Oh, ok. So why are Halflings better rogues? Because they get more skill points. Oh... so then why are Elves better wizards? Because they get more skill points... Boring!
It is more along the lines of: "Why are Half-orcs better barbarians? Because they are better at those skills that make a good barbarian."
Compare: Why are half-orcs better barbarians? Because they're more savage! Why are halflings better rogues? Because they're sneakier! Why are Elves better wizards? Because they learn spells more easily!
That, to me, should be the realm of race-limited Prestige classes or racial substitution levels.
-Stuart