What makes a successful superhero game?

I mean...it's serialized superhero fiction. I doesn't make logical real-world sense. It's not supposed to. It's the whole "why doesn't Gandalf use the Eagles to fly the ring to Mount Doom on page 5 of Lord of the Rings" problem, i.e. it's a story and follows story logic. It's not a game, it doesn't follow gamer logic. To me that's a feature not a bug. The closer games can get to working like actual stories work, the better.
I mean, yes and no? I agree that it’s a criticism you can extend to many superhero comics - Cap never beats the Red Skull either - but it’s more or less unique to the two big superhero universes, which insist on going on forever (nearly a century now and counting) with their characters rather than letting them age, retire, and die, and getting new ones. Pretty much every other form of serialised fiction, superhero or otherwise, doesn’t do this, often because of real-world limitations (ages of actors, a single ageing writer, etc). Marvel and DC are also required to maintain sales every year or even every month, so popular characters are never allowed to stop and have to be brought back every few years to relive their greatest hits for the audience, like zombie Rolling Stones.

Batman is particularly bad because it’s never really come to terms with its basic premise and how it engages with the realities of crime and society, and it only has about three stories which are trotted out anew with the same old characters every so often. It’s entirely believable that Gotham (at least the bits we see, hopefully not the entire population of 8 million or whatever) is actually in Hell and Bruce is being punished by some supernatural force. It’s all as depressing as heck.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I've played in four "SH" campaigns. one V&V, two Champions, and one M&M. (don't know the editions of any of them, sorry). The V&V game, we were definitely street-level; a telepath/telekinetic, an empowered martial artist, a "speedster" (actually "stopped time" in small increments), and a squishy blaster. We struggled against hordes of government agents (think the TV series Heroes, just discovering our powers), then started to face other new "supers".

One Champions game we were the "Avengers Carribean!" (psssh! confetti spray - yes, we paid group design points to have that special effect whenever our name was said), based in Ann Arbor, MI. Standard Hero Level; I was an ex-air force Johnny Storm-like, and then we had a college student hulk-like, a mastermind illusionist, a slow speedster/blaster, and a martial artist. We fought science-accident monsters in the diag, and got sent on the inconvenient missions the actual Avengers didn't want to bother with.

The other Champions game I ran, hacked to simulate Bubblegum Crisis and power armor suits. And we discovered that a simple AK-47 - according to the book stats - is more powerful than our "60pt powers, one 75pt specialty" supers! 5d6 ranged killing attack was super lethal. Granted, the powered armor supers could survive a full auto burst, but they were down; on the other hand, the supers had many utility power they had to use creatively. So... high street-level effective power?

the Mutants & Masterminds campaign, we were again "high-street level". Like Legion of Superfriends cartoon show power, real Silver Age stuff. I was a spellcaster with a magic staff and ankh found in an Egyptian tomb; all my powers were themed by egyptian gods. We had a nuclear-powered hulk-like, an elementalist that was literally half water and half fire, a super-skilled government agent (and also our Fixer, getting us jobs)... and Ghost, a person out of phase with the world who could only affect it with his powers (we officially didn't even know he was there, just sometimes bad guys fell down or lucky things happened we couldn't explain).

So 3 out of 4 games, "high-street level". Kinda like D&D 5e and bounded accuracy, we could try to fight dragons (real threats, world-enders), but we still had to be careful around goblins (cops, agents, thugs with guns). And the 4th was low street level.

I don't think I'd want to play in a Justice League (Superman, plot-armor Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern) game. Yes, there should absolutely be problems you can't punch -- and you shuldn't be able to solve those problems by using a single power.
 

I mean, yes and no? I agree that it’s a criticism you can extend to many superhero comics - Cap never beats the Red Skull either - but it’s more or less unique to the two big superhero universes, which insist on going on forever (nearly a century now and counting) with their characters rather than letting them age, retire, and die, and getting new ones. Pretty much every other form of serialised fiction, superhero or otherwise, doesn’t do this, often because of real-world limitations (ages of actors, a single ageing writer, etc). Marvel and DC are also required to maintain sales every year or even every month, so popular characters are never allowed to stop and have to be brought back every few years to relive their greatest hits for the audience, like zombie Rolling Stones.
That's not true. Look at just about any serialized fiction and you see the same thing. James Bond. Different actors playing the same character over decades. Doctor Who. Different actors playing the same character over decades...fighting some of the exact same enemies. Star Trek TOS. They've recast many of the characters at least 2-3 times now. Detective novels. Look at any of the big name characters and their careers span decades longer than they should because the writer keeps writing books about them. On and on and on. Serialized characters that don't do this are the exception, not the rule.
Batman is particularly bad because it’s never really come to terms with its basic premise and how it engages with the realities of crime and society, and it only has about three stories which are trotted out anew with the same old characters every so often. It’s entirely believable that Gotham (at least the bits we see, hopefully not the entire population of 8 million or whatever) is actually in Hell and Bruce is being punished by some supernatural force. It’s all as depressing as heck.
Again, only if you expect fiction to conform to real-world expectation. It's a good, fun, pulpy beat 'em up. That's all. It's not meant as commentary of social issues or crime. It's children's fiction.
 

Remove ads

Top