Mirtek said:Actually it was one of the 4e design tenets that D&D is based in medieval european fantasy![]()
And the recent design/development chaps have mentioned trying to distance D&D from real world cultures/history.
Mirtek said:Actually it was one of the 4e design tenets that D&D is based in medieval european fantasy![]()
Mouseferatu said:1E did that, as an optional rule. It was annoying as all hell, and I never met a single person who used it more than once.
Go the whole hog, go for an A-10!Mouseferatu said:(Though actually, if we're talking plate armor, give me a crossbow, not a bow.)
mach1.9pants said:Go the whole hog, go for an A-10!
The Swashbuckler kit showed up in both, but I think it's important to note that the actual abilities they granted were different.Klaus said:They were in both. Several kits got repeated, like Peasant Hero and whatnot.
Well, I'm certainly no expert on this, but there was also a sword type called 'Panzerstecher' in German (~ 'armor piercing sword') for use against heavily armored foes. IIRC, it looked a bit like the elven thinblade from Complete Warrior.Carnivorous_Bean said:The best sword for use against plate armor remains the bastard sword or hand-and-a-half sword or longsword, IMO and from what I've read (our D&D longsword is just a sword, or a "war sword", actually). Long enough to give reach while gripping the hilt with one hand and the blade with the other for quick, strong, accurate stabs at the weak points and joints.
Indeed they were.D.Shaffer said:The Swashbuckler kit showed up in both, but I think it's important to note that the actual abilities they granted were different.![]()
Mouseferatu said:1E did that, as an optional rule. It was annoying as all hell, and I never met a single person who used it more than once.