Winter IrondDM (Winner)!

Greybar: Fantastic!!! <-- Three Exclamation Points, Even! I won't say more until after judgement, but I really liked yours. I really like mine, too, but I won't feel bad if I lose this round to you :D.

Also, I see we both went with an alternate meaning of the word 'lock' :). Makes me wonder if that's what incognito intended...

As a side note: I'm really, really sorry about the length. 3,000 words is pushing it, even for me, but everything I put in 'felt' necessary :(. And this is cut down!
 

log in or register to remove this ad

seasong said:
I'm now skimming the prior posts - QuickBeam, my condolences. I hope your friend is doing okay (read: surviving, I know it's not really 'okay' at this point).

Thank you seasong. Fortunately, they've known she was quite ill with cancer for some time, and I believe he had the opportunity to make his peace with things. It's never easy, but the end of her daily suffering provides some relief and solace to the family.

I just feel him leaning a bit more on me than others, because my father died of cancer just over two years ago.
 

Seasong:

Thanks for your exclamation points. Given the skill of your Story Hour and your own entry, I accept it as high praise indeed.

I think your entry is great as well, nice twists and I love the description of the ship's crew and the tavern. However, if we keep backslapping like this, someone is bound to be nauseated out there. :D

Also, I see we both went with an alternate meaning of the word 'lock'

Yeah, I love that. I was suspecting that a simple lock would be, well, too simple.

John
 

Quickbeam:

On exposition: I would like to throw in that the paladin's use of a scythe was a beautiful image in my mind. It really made a "I'm a paladin, not a noble" feel stick. And of course we'd all like to think of a Smite Evil with a critical on a scythe...

On reality, hard as it can fall: Best wishes for endurance with the friend and family. It feels terrible to feel that sometimes the end is what brings less suffering, but I agree it can carry truth. I'm sure that this brings echos for you, but I hope it also brings strength for your friend.

John
 

Reply to the Judge's analysis

Let me begin with the good:
I was thrilled that you enjoyed the political intrigue around which much of this entry centered. It's the first time I've ever really crafted a tale with this much politics and in-fighting, but I thought it turned out well. I was also encouraged by the fact that Faroun the Jackalwere was so well received -- using archaic game elements is not guaranteed to please the Judge, especially when they aren't even theme ingredients!!
I was marginally concerned about my use of The Dolphin King element as a boat's name, but it just seemed too plausible conceptually to ignore. It's hard to say when use of a theme item in this fashion is good and when it's contrived. I couldn't have been happier with my use of the All Around Vision as an ingredient, especially given it's comical tie in to the gaze sleep attack. And finally, I'm genuinely pleased that the wealth of detail and NPC options were applauded.

The not so good:
Let me begin by saying that your suggestion of using the misperceived effects of all around vision for Faroun as the Obvious snafu, never even occured to me. It seems incredibly logical now...but I just overlooked this possibility. I thoroughly agree that the story's length was a concern, but I just didn't see many ways to shorten things without losing some of the flavor or necessary background text. Even you suggest that the Expatriate Crattus Irvee needed more development, or could have been used further ;).
Certainly goblins could have been used in lieu of orcs, and perhaps they even make more sense. As I mentioned in my exposition, there were two snafus provided, but I'd agree that neither is particularly compelling. They both fit the story well IMO, but don't so much in an additive sense.
The main area of disagreement with the assessment of my entry is with respect to the Iron Golem. Since it wasn't a theme ingredient, I won't lose much sleep over this, but I did want to reply. I'm firmly of the opinion, that every so often PC's need to find themselves in situations they cannot overcome by might. I agree that this foe is entirely too powerful for the party to defeat directly, but it could be bypassed in other ways...one of which was provided. The DM does not have to use the breath weapon on the party; could fudge the saving throw DC; or choose to attack someone with a high Fortitude save. This isn't a big deal, but I really felt it was important to have a potent guardian for the tomb, even moreso in that he wielded the Blade of Jaern which is too powerful an item for 4th-6th level characters.

Thanks for the very thorough and fair analysis Incognito. And I promise to avoid ALL future edits to my entry posts going forward, even if they are not content related. Sorry for this obvious snafu on my part ;).
 
Last edited:

Round 1, set 3

Greybar vs. Seasong

Well, I knew it was going to happen – these entries are very difficult to pick between, due to, in a large part, to the cleverness, and excellent writing of both submissions. Any of you who think it’s hard to write an IronDM entry – you should try the judging!

Let’s start with what’s good, and see where we end up. Both scenarios feature exceptional NPCs! The meat and drink of any good role-play adventure, Grey Bar’s tragic hero Captain, and Seasong’s dubious, competent Captian both have amazing flavor. We understand why the Wrightson cannot undertake this chase, instead of it being some obtuse plot device. In a similar fashion, we read about Johannes with a sort of horrified fascination. She is a marvelously complex individual, who practically BEGS for the second plot twist. It makes a more real character out of Rupert. Outstanding use of the ingredient, both parties.

How about simple lock? Seasong’s too sharp for his own good – this one was meant to be open to interpretation. One the one hand, the PHB lists a “simple lock” as a std DC 20 open locks check. But as we’ve read there are other uses of the word. I’ll give the edge to Greybar here – using canal locks was particularly imaginative. Plus I just like the incorporation of simple mechanical principles – like canal locks into a fantasy setting. It maintains verisimilitude.

In the same way, I appreciated the Financial Coup being incorporated into the story, instead of being tacked on as I had originally feared it would be. It’s easy to see the relation between the moaning diamond, and using it’s potential wealth as a lever to advance this ingredient, so no one gets bonus points for incorporating those two together.

Another area where both submissions shine is hooks. Many times, submission will have the same hook repeatedly, just from a slightly different angle. Not so here: edge goes, of course, to seasong, who is even creating twists to his own hooks mid-stream! I like ways of drawing a party into an adventure without railroading, and both submissions have multiple avenues in.

One thing I was surprised about, ingredient-wise. The Moaning Diamond is an out-of-the-box 3E artifact, but neither submission took the bait on that one. Strictly speaking, there are no points taken off for liberal interpretation of this ingredient, but I would like to see someone make use of summoning an elder earth elemental with maximum hit points. Ouch!

So, how do I make a judgment? Well there were a few weaknesses, in each post. Greybar slaps on the ingredient A Brace of Gargolyes there is not enough in-story reason for the gargoyles to be antagonists. Also, I wonder if a party that was equipped with the spell “Fly” would serve to ruin the pacing of his adventure, as the speed of fly has got to be greater than barge travel. Really that’s it, though. Although we all suspected that the former bandit might make an appearance in his adventure, I did not guess that Penelore was the thief until it was revealed. The only other suggestion that I can make is to build surprise, the party spend time in the city before the theft takes place to establish the heroic character couple of Wrightson and Penelore. Oh, and the feathered hat (on the captian) is silly!

Seasong, has a few weaknesses too. For one – for the Love of Glub his submission is long.! This was his single biggest deduction, though I too tend to be verbose – the mantra is do as I SAY, not as I DO ;) The other issue is, without some judicious application of which twists to use, the plot in seasong’s submission can get over-convoluted. The double, double cross is a great plot device, but a triple cross with a patsy can leave players with a sense of “oh, just kill everybody, they’re all guilty, I know it!” Someone’s always gotta play the straight man.

I’ve yet to show a clear indication of the winner. Well, I’ll just tell you straight out, and then say why. It’s Seasong and it’s for his triple-threat moaning diamond as item that drive’s the Fincial Coup, motivates the Brace of Gragolyes to preserve their home, acts as a MacGuffin to advance Rupert’s story line, and is the key to the fogged windows. It’s too good. It’s the winner by a nose.

Gentlemen, please post exposition.

PS: Quickbeam - let me add my sypathies - I did not before, and they are certainly there.

Mythago, and Mirthcard: you are next, chime in when ready (becasue your ingredient's sure are!)
 
Last edited:


Greybar said:
Quickbeam:

On exposition: I would like to throw in that the paladin's use of a scythe was a beautiful image in my mind. It really made a "I'm a paladin, not a noble" feel stick. And of course we'd all like to think of a Smite Evil with a critical on a scythe...

On reality, hard as it can fall: Best wishes for endurance with the friend and family. It feels terrible to feel that sometimes the end is what brings less suffering, but I agree it can carry truth. I'm sure that this brings echos for you, but I hope it also brings strength for your friend.

John

In regards to the exposition: Thanks!! I was rather fond of the farmboy turned paladin hero, and liked the nostagliac feel of his weapon being a tool he might have grown up using. It just seemed to lend credibility to this character. Besides, as you pointed out, who wouldn't want to see a critical Smite attack with one of these things?!?

As for reality: Thanks here also. I promise to stop hijacking this thread with RL concerns, but I didn't want anyone to think I'd just ignored Incognito's analysis after asking him to complete one on my behalf.
 


mythago: until what time (EST) do you monitor these boards?

If I don't hear from mirthcard, I will go to an alternate, as I leave work in less that 3 hours, and I want the ingredients out before then.

Mirhtcard - hurry up! Althernates, chime in if your out there!
 

Remove ads

Top