Thank you.
Right, I see. I'll have to take a deeper look when the book comes out, but right now the guilds feel like a bit of a weak hook. The interplay between factions with differing goals and ideals is a crux of many settings to me, so it feels odd to go, "yeah, this setting's interesting thing is that it has factions."
Part of that, though, is because when I look into whether a setting interests me or not, it's the encouraged style of campaign that interests me, rather than a setting element. This book focuses heavily on the factions element, and seems to lack in the interesting locales (unless the Tenth District is more varied than the name implies), and I know nearly nothing of what sort of genre the setting wants to encourage, though I imagine political intrigue is going to be a focal point.
Lets see...Congratulations on your attempt to use sarcasm to disguise the fact that you have no answer to my challenge.
Ravnica was a MtG setting. Now it is a D&D setting. And the marketing has been perfectly clear about that from the start, that this would be a D&D book, not a MtG book, and it wouldn't be adding planeswalkers or coloured magic to D&D.
You can argue that it's a bad decision, you can state without argument that it's not what you want (I wanted Dark Sun, but we rarely get what we want, welcome to Real Life), but you can't argue that MtG-in-D&D was promised without gross dishonesty.
WotC is not hosting the RPGSports duels. It's been mentioned multiple times already.
Your mileage may vary, but I'm quite happy with my time and money investment, and goodness knows that I am hardly alone.
"Ummm.... Magic the Gathering is repeatedly mentioned in the sample page we have, linked in the first post.In MtG, Ravnica is part of the MtG multiverse. In DnD, it is part of the DnD multiverse. If you can't wrap your head around that, I cant help you and you'll just have to live in denial.
Arguably not.Dragonlance SAGA was not a D&D product.
Congratulations on your attempt to use sarcasm to disguise the fact that you have no answer to my challenge.
Ravnica was a MtG setting. Now it is a D&D setting. And the marketing has been perfectly clear about that from the start, that this would be a D&D book, not a MtG book, and it wouldn't be adding planeswalkers or coloured magic to D&D.
You can argue that it's a bad decision, you can state without argument that it's not what you want (I wanted Dark Sun, but we rarely get what we want, welcome to Real Life), but you can't argue that MtG-in-D&D was promised without gross dishonesty.
Arguably not.
But what about the original Dragonlance novels? And if they count, what about the SAGA novels? How about the modules with both SAGA and AD&D Rules?
What about a D&D board game? Those are often less “D&D” than SAGA but have the D&D iconography.
So, is this a MtG branded product? I’d say “yes”. Just like a MtG CCG set that was themed around Faerun would kinda be a D&D product.