JiffyPopTart
Bree-Yark
You inferred that "some people here" referred to you, but it didn't. It refers to my own personal experience in the past half a year or so where EVERY FRACKING TIME I express a desire for more crunch I then have to argue with someone why that opinion isn't wrong.Yes you were talking to me, and now you're being disingenuous. He said X, I responded to him with Y, he responded to me with Z, and then you quoted Z and referred back to what I had said in Y. To be specific, I responded to him about him wanting more crunch, he responded back to me saying he can't be the only one feeling that way, and you responded to him saying he wasn't the only one feeling that way but "some people here..." and everything past "some people here..." was referring back to my post. And then when I called you on it you played this silly game as if that isn't what just happened that everyone saw happen.
You can post that opinion on this forum, but you also have to deal with people disagreeing with you without whining about people disagreeing with you is something like being blasted. It's a DISCUSSION FORUM. You need to be able to deal with people disagreeing with your opinion without acting like you're some victim if there is dissent from your view.
It's nice to have support in your opinions, and I was offering that support to @Undave.
I read these forums on my phone. It's not the best format to do so, but it's what I have. I don't read threads linearly, one post after another, and I did t read your post preceding the post I replied to. I was literally sitting in the Five Guys parking lot waiting on my burger, clicked the thread, read the comment I replied to, then immediately replied my thoughts.
So, once again I was talking to @Undave about his statement and his statement only.