D&D 5E Toward a new D&D aesthetics

What is your feeling about the changes in aesthetics of D&D illustrations?

  • I really enjoy those changes. The illustrations resemble well my ideal setting!

  • I'm ok with those changes, even if my ideal setting has a different aesthetics.

  • I'm uncertain about those changes

  • I'm not ok with those changes because it impairs my immersion in the game.

  • I hate those changes, I do not recognize D&D anymore

  • The art doesn't really matter to me either way. I don't buy/play the game for the art.

  • Change in aesthetics? Where? What?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad


No, the motive is clear. Be non-offensive, and age neutral. Thats the whole point of the tangent.
The motive is to maximize profit. If that type of release would have insufficient sales to justify its publication over something else (because it uses resources that could be allocated elsewhere), that's why it's not going to be done.

If "non-offensive" things sell better, that's why they get made.
 



Lanefan

Victoria Rules
I suspect we'll get a very clear idea of where the aesthetic is going next once we see what tack this upcoming D&D movie ends up taking, as if the movie is any sort of hit it'll set the tone for the rest of the game/franchise for a while.

If they can nail about an LotR-movie degree on the light-and-fluffy vs dark-and-edgy spectrum they'll be gold.
 

Scribe

Legend
The motive is to maximize profit. If that type of release would have insufficient sales to justify its publication over something else (because it uses resources that could be allocated elsewhere), that's why it's not going to be done.

If "non-offensive" things sell better, that's why they get made.
Yes yes, capitalism, very interesting.
 




Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top