They literally want to play Aragorn. Y'know, the Ranger. Who was a non-magic wilderness explorer.
Aragorn can read peoples minds (detect thoughts) use what would be the equivalent of the Command spell, strike fear in his enemies by looking at them, has an Iron Will (which the 1E spell is probably based on), extended his lifetime through magic, could bring people back from the brink of death (revifify), uses healing magic, tries unsuccessfully to use scrying magic at Amon Hen and summons undead.
This is all in middle earth which is a low magic setting.
Aragorn was the inspiration for the original Gygax Ranger and that is probably why that class in 1E got both Druid and Magic-user spells.
Maybe if you are talking about the movie Aragorn you may have a point, just like the DNDHAT movie Bard is non-magic, but Aragorn "as written" by Tolkien is not non-magical.
Why should the fighty druid or the wilder rogue get wizard things?
I identify them more with Ranger. Roge can get them through a subclass though.
I mean the trend is for every attempt to fix the ranger somehow make them worse. Why break an almost 25 year streak?
I love the current Ranger. Not perfect, but petty darn good.
Last edited: