Hah! You fell for my clever test to see how much of a grognard you are! It was ... umm ... a test you see! Yes a test!/disappointed
everyone knows it's +2 for charging and +1 for highground.
You mean the spell the designers themselves admitted to making better than it's level due to D&D's terrible relationship with tradition and nostalgia?Do you actually play 5E? Fireball hasn't been that good since 2E.
so it's just OK to use as other 3rd level damage spells are almost a waste of a slot and action.You mean the spell the designers themselves admitted to making better than it's level due to D&D's terrible relationship with tradition and nostalgia?
also fireball really only gets to be broken like that when a PC gets to just mash the 5th level version of it over and over again as Crawford once said. Unfortunately I don't think he was talking about the class that can do that when he said itso it's just OK to use as other 3rd level damage spells are almost a waste of a slot and action.
Yes, I do, thanks for asking.Do you actually play 5E? Fireball hasn't been that good since 2E.
You mean the spell the designers themselves admitted to making better than it's level due to D&D's terrible relationship with tradition and nostalgia?
Isn't this thread about trying to convince us 5.5 is going to be more broken than the MC Escher painting that was 3.5? Why are you reminding us how that's never, ever going to be the case?Remember the really broken and overpowered warmage from 3.5 where the monsters had around half the hit points?
Isn't this thread about trying to convince us 5.5 is going to be more broken than the MC Escher painting that was 3.5? Why are you reminding us how that's never, ever going to be the case?