For some reason I'm reminded of Zeno's "paradox" of motion.
Zeno's paradoxes - Wikipedia
To travel the whole distance from A to B, you must first travel half that distance. To travel half that distance, you must first travel half that distance. To travel half that distance, you must first travel half that distance. Ad infinitum. Therefore, it's impossible to travel from A to B.
And this is why I walked out on my first year of uni math final in disgust.![]()
a<-58/40-1
[1] FALSEb<-18/40
(a==b)
[1] -5551.115(a-b)*1e20
Sure, except that (3) in that case only approaches 1/3. 3(.9) isn't 4, except maybe in "might as well be for practical purposes."
For some reason I'm reminded of Zeno's "paradox" of motion.
Zeno's paradoxes - Wikipedia
To travel the whole distance from A to B, you must first travel half that distance. To travel half that distance, you must first travel half that distance. To travel half that distance, you must first travel half that distance. Ad infinitum. Therefore, it's impossible to travel from A to B.
No, you understood it. It (.9) equalled 1 then there wouldn't be mathematical symbology for a number approaching a value.Isn't .(9) exactly 1 in math? (With apologies if I misunderstood the remark).
View attachment 386123
Using the geometric series stuff from Calc 2 commonly brought up in regards to...
No, you understood it. It (.9) equalled 1 then there wouldn't be mathematical symbology for a number approaching a value.
In my mind, I’m picturing a variation on the old SNL Landshark skits.