Ms Marvel (spoilers)

Yeah, given how quickly things happen in the world of computing, it's pretty negligent, though not sure they'd be able to react in nanoseconds. Setting up more safeguards, perhaps?

Yeah, like maybe using a system that doesn't have connection to the internet?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


was looking at this image this morning and the thought struck me omg good Ms Marvel is Josh Baskin - The Marvels is going to be the MCU version of Big !
7442F806-478D-49AA-B51B-8E11A0B91499.jpeg
 


I think, after having Mom learn about Kamala's powers and activities with Grandma present, and seeing Mom be pretty happy and relaxed when Kamala reveals herself to the rest of the family, also having to have a separate scene of Kamala giving the detailed history that we all just watched to justify a costume change would have been silly.
I don't disagree and think such an explanation would have been out of place. I just thought that that the little references to where all of the bits and pieces of her costume came from were also silly, or at least didn't add much to the story.
 

"Here we have an alien artifact of extreme power that has characteristics of an artificial intelligence! Let's hook it up to our own AI, and walk away."

Seems to fit the basic definition of negligence. And yeah, they are responsible for the results of their negligent actions.

"Let's hook it up to our extremely capable AI so it can monitor its status, and then notify us if anything is changing".

Frankly, it Jarvis didn't have time to tell them, I have little sign they'd have had any more time to do anything if they were watching. Leaving Jarvis to watch it was not negligent from where I sit; it was taking due diligence. It just didn't work.

You can argue as to whether they should have poked at it at all--Stark presented his argument as why, but you don't have to buy it--but once they did they did everything reasonable far as I can tell.
 

Yeah, given how quickly things happen in the world of computing, it's pretty negligent, though not sure they'd be able to react in nanoseconds. Setting up more safeguards, perhaps?

Well, you can argue they could have done more of a black box setup, but that's essentially getting into fighting genre conventions (where in this kind of situation, all that would have done was take up more screen time and still fail).
 

Agreed. At absolute bare minimum running the tests in an isolated network (aka one that is physical disconnected from the internet or other networks, so there is literally no way to have bleed over into your main system).

Really? The thing generated by the Mind Stone? You sure about that?
 

You can argue as to whether they should have poked at it at all--Stark presented his argument as why, but you don't have to buy it--but once they did they did everything reasonable far as I can tell.

No, they didn't. Even today, without super-science, when working on an unknown system that might contain malware, you do so disconnected from any and all networks so whatever is there cannot spread. They failed to take even basic cybersecurity measures.
 


Remove ads

Top