The Ubbergeek
First Post
Tewligan said:"When we last left your characters in the Kingdom of Hentai..."
you mock it, but something like Lodoss War would be close to D&D's classics, no?
Tewligan said:"When we last left your characters in the Kingdom of Hentai..."
CleverNickName said:I like anime...but my childhood exposure to it was mostly from futuristic films like Akira. So it doesn't feel right with my preconceived notions of what D&D should be.
But man...if I'm playing D20 Modern, I'm all over it. All. Over. It.
The Ubbergeek said:you mock it, but something like Lodoss War would be close to D&D's classics, no?
Would the game include a sound track?The_Fan said:Bastard! was also based on D&D...or at least D&D bookcovers, mixed with 70s heavy metal album covers.
Clavis said:IMHO the basic D&D game should be a simple ruleset that assumes a generic traditional Western fantasy setting (based heavily on actual legends and the classic fantasy authors). Other styles of play (wire-fu & anime, science fantasy, dark gothic fantasy, historical earth, etc.) should be available as modular add-ons that do not change the expected baseline. The basic rules should be written in such a way that additional rules and settings can easily slot-in and simply replace baseline rules elements, if players desire. This way, those who want an anime-style game under the D&D name can have it, and those who want traditional Western fantasy can have it too. As it is, it doesn't look like 4th edition D&D is going to be that kind of game. Rather, it seems that new D&D's flavor is going to be very specific to itself, and hard-wired into the rules. Oh well, every corporation has to have their "New Coke".
Clavis said:And Homer, Malory, and the authors who wrote the legends of Charlemagne, Beowulf, etc.
Sure is. And it's still better than what WOTC is now trying to sell us! A mish-mosh made of gold is still made of gold. An intricate sculpture of crap is always made of crap.
That said, I loathe anime. I think almost all of it is poorly done (from an artistic point of view) I think most of them are unintentionally comical (some are probably intentionally comical, but then imo it stops being funny), both as far the stories go, as well as the general 'feel' and look.
FireLance said:A little late to the party, but I just discovered Avatar: The Last Airbender/The Legend of Aang. I wouldn't mind at all if 4e looked like that.![]()
Hussar said:You mean the earlier versions with robots, Godzilla, and expeditions to Alice in Wonderland? What edition was ever heavily based on actual legends and classic fantasy authors?
Hussar said:Oh, you mean that fantasy that isn't actually fantasy but only part of fantasy when it suits people to include it. Gotcha.
Hussar said:What I don't understand is how you can make your definition of fantasy so broad that it includes Homer, but, doesn't include Princess of Mononoke. What kind of logical contortions does that require?
"The norm" is awfully hard to define when it comes to D&D. Personally, I've encountered far more players and DMs who were either trying to ape their favorite fantasy fiction (with mixed success) or to adapt the game to a specific, original gameworld or scenario than to embrace D&D's wacky mixed-bag superhero/martial arts/space opera/fantasy implications. The major exception is the Arduin campaign I ran in the early 80s, which featured insectoid aliens, cartoon characters, robots, and all sorts of other random stuff.Mallus said:Sounds great, but it also sounds that sounds pretty far from the norm, a little like SepulchraveII's wonderful Tales of Wyre story hour. Personally, I can't make D&D support anything quite so weighty.