• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Casino Royale - Best 007 movie in years [some spoilers]

horacethegrey

First Post
Sorry if there were was a thread on this previously. I looked through the archives but I couldn't find any past topic on this. If there was, my apologies, but I just had to get off my chest what I felt about this flick after watching it today.

WOW. :cool:

I mean seriously, this is undoubtedly the best James Bond film I've had the pleasure of watching since From Russia with Love. It's thrilling, action packed, suspense filled, and surprisingly, dramatic and very moving.

If I were to sum up of what made this film so good, let's just say it's similar to what Christopher Nolan did with Batman Begins. What director Martin Campbell has done is essentially reboot the character of James Bond and remodeled him for today's audiences. Gone are the idiotic one liners, replaced instead with some very witty and winning dialogue. So too are the cheesy gadgets, as the most advanced devices you''re likely come across here are the SPOILERS tracking device M has placed inside Bond's body and the mini defiblirator he keeps inside his car SPOILERS. The comic book villains bent on world domination also take a backseat, replaced by an adversary whose existence and goals are far more believable.

Most of all, we finally have a James Bond who feels like a three dimensional character rather than the cartoon parody he'd been portrayed as for the last 30 or so years. I know people have been very skeptical of whether or not Daniel Craig could pull off the role. But trust me, he does, and man does he do it well. His Bond is probably the most ruthless and unrelenting secret agent since Jason Bourne. You're really convinced this guy has a Licence to Kill, judging by the heavy death toll in his wake. Yet, for all his coldbloodedness, he also displays some genuine warmth and vulnerability. How so, you might ask? Well, that would be telling, so I'll leave it to you guys to find out for yourselves. :p But let me just say that Bond's sensitve side could only have been achieved by an actor of Craig's ability, which is considerable.

Oh, and no review of this flick would be complete without mentioning the fabulous Eva Green. I mean, DAMN, I knew this lady was HOT when I fist saw her in Kingdom of Heaven, but she achieves new levels of SEXY with her role as Vesper Lynd here. And I don't just mean those lovely features or that dynamite figure. She has spunk, wit and smarts at her side whenever she opens that beautiful mouth of hers to spar with Craig in some excellent exchanges of dialogue that feature both innuendo and intelligence. She's a breath of fresh air from the bimbos and airheads that we often see Bond pair up with. I demand Hollywood take notice of her right away! :mad:

So there you have it. While some of you Bond traditionalists may find this change of formula a virtual slap in the face, I think it's the breath of fresh air the franchise needed. As I implied before, this is 007 Begins, and I couldn't be happier. I look forward to what new stories this new start has to offer. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

log in or register to remove this ad

Piratecat

Sesquipedalian
I've been wishing for this sort of change for years. I'm looking forward to the movie with anticipation!
 
Last edited:

horacethegrey

First Post
Piratecat said:
I've been looking forward to this sort of change for years. I'm looking forward to the movie with anticipation!

Trust me, it's worth it. I was one of those ready to give up on 007 after Jason Bourne came on the scene. But with this flick, it just goes to show that there's life in the old man yet. (Truth be told though, I await for The Bourne Ultimatum with baited breath as well. :) )
 

dravot

First Post
My snarky comment is that the bar was set so low, that being the best one in years isn't hard. ;)

But I'm glad to hear that people like it, I'm looking forward to a Bond flick again. Yay!
 

Hand of Evil

Hero
Epic
Okay, new life to Bond, fresh breath of air? I question that, as the last four Bond movies had more people in watch and made a lot of money, just look at

2002's #12 Day Another Day:
Domestic: $160,942,139 37.3% + Foreign: $271,028,977 62.7% = Worldwide: $431,971,116
1999's #14 The World is Not Enough:
Domestic: $126,943,684 35.1% + Foreign: $234,888,716 64.9% = Worldwide: $361,832,400
1997's # 10 Tomorrow Never Dies:
Domestic: $125,304,276 36.9% + Foreign: $214,035,826 63.1% = Worldwide: $339,340,102
1995's # 6 Goldeneye:
Domestic: $106,429,941 30.5% + Foreign: $242,465,680 69.5% = Worldwide: $348,895,621

Bond had a new life with PIERCE BROSNAN, would have liked to see him do one more. Now having said that, I am really excided about the new movie, four years has been a long wait.
 

buzzard

First Post
Hand of Evil said:
Bond had a new life with PIERCE BROSNAN, would have liked to see him do one more. Now having said that, I am really excided about the new movie, four years has been a long wait.

While I though Brosnan was a really good Bond, he only had one decent movie in my opinion. I like Goldeneye, but the others were all lacking to my taste. The second was fair at least, but his last two were pretty much utter dreck.

buzzard
 

sniffles

First Post
I'm looking forward to it. I've always preferred Sean Connery's earlier films like From Russia With Love and Goldfinger. I liked Roger Moore when I was a teenager, but now I'd rather pretend most of his films didn't exist. I like Pierce Brosnan too, but I always preferred the tougher, colder Bond to the suave ladies' man.

I'm just disappointed I won't get to see it on opening night. :(
 

delericho

Legend
Hand of Evil said:
Okay, new life to Bond, fresh breath of air? I question that, as the last four Bond movies had more people in watch and made a lot of money...

Bond had a new life with PIERCE BROSNAN, would have liked to see him do one more. Now having said that, I am really excided about the new movie, four years has been a long wait.

The thing is, although they made money, the Brosnan Bond flicks just weren't very good. "Goldeneye" was good, and I thought "Tomorrow Never Dies" was excellent (I would probably rate those two equally, but Goldeneye really lost me with the Bond-jumps-into-falling-plane bit). But I thought "The World is not Enough" was pathetic, and "Die Another Day" was only marginally better.

One thing I want to know about Casino Royale: since they're using the same 'M', are we to assume that "James Bond" is just the name assigned to the current 007, and that we're essentially in the same continuity, or should we forget that which has gone before?
 

delericho said:
One thing I want to know about Casino Royale: since they're using the same 'M', are we to assume that "James Bond" is just the name assigned to the current 007, and that we're essentially in the same continuity, or should we forget that which has gone before?

My understanding is that this is a reboot. Forget everything. This is the "first" Bond movie of the new crop.

As much as I like Judi Dench, I think it was a mistake to use her, for precisely this reason. If it's a reboot, it needs to be a reboot in all respects, IMO.

Then again, if the inclusion of Judi Dench turns out to be my only major problem, it'll be a fantastic movie indeed. ;)
 

horacethegrey

First Post
delericho said:
One thing I want to know about Casino Royale: since they're using the same 'M', are we to assume that "James Bond" is just the name assigned to the current 007, and that we're essentially in the same continuity, or should we forget that which has gone before?
As I said before, this is Bond Begins, a rebooting of the franchise. Pretend that all the previous Bond flicks never happened, and you'll be just fine. ;)

As for Judi Dench playing M again, I guess they didn't want to let her go since she is a fantastic actress (and believe me, she does a great job here). One thing though, SPOILERS her M here is very different from the Brosnan films. While the M from there was a no nonsense woman who saw Brosnan's Bond as a trusted subordinate and ally, Craig's Bond gets no such treatment, as she berates him for his recklessness and lack of judgement after a botched mission. At one point she even implies that she'll have him killed if he messes up again. SPOILERS
 

Remove ads

Top