yeah, the Warlock got sacrificed on the altar of design refusal and nonsensical polling as well. One more reason to not care about 2024. Clearly we want different things.
All you can do i log onto surveys a hundred times and dump ratings.
MM: if the changes are in line with Volos to MotM, then I consider that a win
too late now, nothing worth saving is left
I assure you as a Wizard fan I definitely do not want other classes to suck. That's frankly an absurd statement, and you have zero support for it.
Yes. But I think you should spend a day getting on board over some obscure thing nobody else cares about, and then the next day declare you're over it and are done.
Yeah, I know your feelings on short rests, and I think you know mine. Not much more to be said there, other than that I’m glad the majority of D&D players do seem to prefer pact magic.
We say that in the US too. For what it’s worth, I do agree that I think WotC’s methodology for this sucks, despite largely being content with the results so far. It’s a highly conservative approach, which makes sense if the goal is to make a game that’s “good enough” for the largest number of people possible, but not if the goal is to make the best game possible for a specific target audience. I would much prefer the latter approach, but I can understand why WotC favors the former.
If they poll 10 units of people, and 2 units of people like X and 8 units of people don't like X, and you're one of the 2 units that liked it, it's not that they're not listening to you. It's that you're not listening to the 8 units who didn't like it.
I disagree. I want monsters to have more and interesting abilities. I think this is something 4e did better than 5e. And I want them to playtest it to get survey data to see if 70% of people agree with me that people want more and interesting abilities on their monsters.
