Let's Talk About Metacurrency

[Thomas Shey]

Ok, but at least they're tied to the world, and like I said I feel genre emulation is more acceptable to me in supers games. I just don't believe it's all or nothing. A game like FASERIP or Mutants & Masterminds or the current Marvel Multiverse game is less dependent on meta-currency and narrativist mechanics than Marvel Heroic.

I think that's a pretty big overstatement with M&M at least. Pull the metacurrency out of it and the damage/effect system would break right quick (because it would be too linear).

 

[Micah Sweet]

If there's no consistency, I'm not really sure I see how relevant any fictional measurement matters. At that point its just color commentary.

Different measurements by different people. Why would you expect them to be entirely consistent with each other? And even so, in a general sense that consistency is roughly maintained in my experience.

 

[Micah Sweet]

I think that's a pretty big overstatement with M&M at least. Pull the metacurrency out of it and the damage/effect system would break right quick (because it would be too linear).

You probably know it better than I, but that game never struck me as heavily meta-currency dependent. Most mechanics in it map to features of the setting to my mind (which is my definition of whether or not something should be considered "meta").

 

[Nytmare]

The Hulk, Superman, and Professor X have measurable super powers. Batman just having whatever is needed is a narrative conceits. Do you not see the difference?

It's not a narrative conceit. He's smart enough to have thought that far ahead. Because there is no way to accurately simulate that, they provide a mechanical shortcut that allows a normal human being who is pretending to be Batman to get to the same end result. It's simulating the result, not the process.