D&D 5E Mythic Odysseys of Theros Reviews

Did you, or will you, buy Mythic Odysseys of Theros



log in or register to remove this ad

I just think monks in D&D are cool. They're fun to play, have neat abilities, and represent a cool archetype. I don't have a problem with their being adapted to a specific setting, if they do a good job. It would sadden me if they were pulled from the game.
Yep.
And while I mostly agree with Paul about racism (there absolutely is such thing as more or less racist. Obviously.) I don’t think the Monk is especially racist.

But even if it does get changed due to its problematic elements, it will probably be “hey, team of cultural consultants who are big D&D nerds and experienced game designers of Asian descent, help us make a monk that isn’t problematic!” Not “No more monk!”

I’d love a reskin and rebuild that looks at Polynesian Mana, and ideas of unarmored warriors of various cultures in various regions. I could see something truly wonderful coming out of a spiritual/mystic warrior inspired by South Asian, Polynesian, and Indigenous American, concepts and historical/mythic warriors.

In the meantime, I might dig into the idea of mana more, and try to think about ki as a partly internal but also partly social and spiritual and...ancestral, power. Might be something to that for a subclass.
 


“You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common,” the Doctor said. “They don’t alter their views to fit the facts. They alter the facts to fit their views.”

Except I'm not changing the facts. Webster is:



 

Yep.
And while I mostly agree with Paul about racism (there absolutely is such thing as more or less racist. Obviously.) I don’t think the Monk is especially racist.
I agree, it's not inherently racist, it's racist by association. I didn't use the term Kung Fu guy by accident. As most know the original monk was largely based on the then popular Kung Fu TV show. Which is why the idea of "the monk as a foreigner" is so much part of the class.

The monk can survive in D&D if it can distance itself completely from it's roots, and let the TV show be completely forgotten. It's the Class of River Tamm and Black Widow, and has nothing to do with exotic strangers.
 

Except I'm not changing the facts. Webster is:



That just means you are not the person who is very stupid/powerful.
 

I agree, it's not inherently racist, it's racist by association. I didn't use the term Kung Fu guy by accident. As most know the original monk was largely based on the then popular Kung Fu TV show. Which is why the idea of "the monk as a foreigner" is so much part of the class.

The monk can survive in D&D if it can distance itself completely from it's roots, and let the TV show be completely forgotten.
What would that mean, exactly? What do they need to change about the class to make it acceptable to you? You seem very certain that changes need to be made.
 

I agree, it's not inherently racist, it's racist by association. I didn't use the term Kung Fu guy by accident. As most know the original monk was largely based on the then popular Kung Fu TV show. Which is why the idea of "the monk as a foreigner" is so much part of the class.

The monk can survive in D&D if it can distance itself completely from it's roots, and let the TV show be completely forgotten.

What is the process by which something becomes racist by association.

How we do go from:

1. Humans are individuals who make individual choices.
2. Human come in many phenotypes, one of those is skin color
3. We choose to organize people by skin color into something called races. (Isn't this racist?)

to:

XXX. Monks are racist.
 

What is the process by which something becomes racist by association.

How we do go from:

1. Humans are individuals who make individual choices.
2. Human come in many phenotypes, one of those is skin color
3. We choose to organize people by skin color into something called races. (Isn't this racist?)
. . .
XXX. Monks are racist.
In the same way we go from:

1. I choose defintions to suit myself.

to

2. Anything I like.
 

What would that mean, exactly? What do they need to change about the class to make it acceptable to you? You seem very certain that changes need to be made.
What about a martial artist whose training tends towards the supernatural? Can that concept be handled appropriately? What language would we need to use?
 

Remove ads

Top