Undrave
Legend
The current WOTC can barely come up with interesting concepts that they wont void with their surveys.
The ranger's PHB subclasses are the most basic RPG archetypes of rangers. They didn't make ranger subclassesin any setting book. The XGTE subclasses is hunter but dark, updated hunter, and a 3.0 prc. And the Tasha ones are likely Shino Aburame and "what if your dryad gf teaches you magic".
It's funny how WOTC hardcoded the wizard heavily into being a "magic library nerd" and at the same time some people wanting to stuff other non-bookworm arcanists into the wizard as subclasses.
The barbarian lucked out that someone fellonto "what if rage was actually magic" in 4e.
I think they shot themselves in the foot making the Wizards subclasses 'schools', and especially going through all of them right away instead of waiting until they had a stronger concept for like, a Necromancer specialist. I think the Abjurer and Diviner are the most interesting of the PHB Wizard subclass, from what I see, just reading it.
I feel like they missed a trick by not giving us an Archeologist Adventurer (Lore Hunter?) Wizard, like a mirror image of the Arcane Trickster. Instead of a rogue who learned Wizard Magic to be a better Rogue, it's a Wizard who learned Rogue tricks to be better at going into old ruins and finding the spells to add to their book.
Like, that Wizard could use INT when using Thieve's Tools or trying to find traps, maybe having expertise and some extra HP?