Kesh
First Post
Mark said:
You forgot the animated series...![]()
Are you kidding? The animated series was great! And here are five reasons.

5) Harry Mudd
4) More tribbles!
3) Spock as a kid with his pet
2) Kzinti!
1) Lt. M'ress. *purrrr*

Mark said:
You forgot the animated series...![]()
Nightstorm said:The real problems with Star Trek:
2. NO gay people in the future? On a show that is suppose to be all inclusive?
Nightstorm said:The real problems with Star Trek:
1. Rehased plot lines and recylced character concepts.
2. NO gay people in the future? On a show that is suppose to be all inclusive?
durath said:
It's kind of funny this came up. Check out the deleted scenes on the Star Trek:Nemesis DVD which was just recently released.
I believe it is the final deleted scene where Picard is inspecting his new Captain's chair. The eager officer who installed it tells him to push a certain button and *ta-da* a seatbelt pops out of the thing to restrain him.
jasper said:
voyage 70 years to earth hmm what happen to transwarp from movie three. I guess Kirk drop the plans on the deck when he left the ship and no one made back ups.
borg. pull their tube they all fall down. Shoot them with bullets they all fall down. Shoot them with the funny light beams only one fall down. Hello did not Picard make note from his movie. bullets kill. I guess no one in Star fleet can get a gun permit. Yeah you can have two phaser cannons but a shot gun. Hey that can kill people.
Mustrum_Ridcully said:Oh, in the last season of DS9 there was a projectile weapon, but it was extremely improved: It used a transporter to beam the projectile to anywhere within the reach of the transporter and than hit a target...
Apperantly, it was a Starfleet Design they abondened later, though I cannot remember the reasons for it. (Maybe because it is obviosuly an assassination weapon, nothing Starfleet or the Federation could really tolerate?)
Nightstorm said:The real problems with Star Trek:
2. NO gay people in the future? On a show that is suppose to be all inclusive?