Post your party alignment here! *Systems with nine alignments only*

[Jon_Dahl]

This thread actually has a deeper meaning than just spamming alignments without any real debate or discussion; I'm thinking if we can get 50, 60 or more posts here we could actually figure out what is the most popular alignment in D&D. I'm thinking that it HAS to be (True) Neutral, but we'll see... Is this really a game of heroic fantasy? If so, then good alignments should have a crushing victory here, right?

Let's see some rules here:
1. AD&D 1st/2nd edition, 3.0, 3.5, Pathfinder.
2. You can't post the same character's alignment twice.
3. Please: Two consecutive posts from the same user should be avoided
4. Add alignment acronyms in order to help any possible calculations.

I'll start.
Currently playing D&D 3.5. My current party consists:
N
CN
CN
CN

Should be a fun...

 

[RUMBLETiGER]

My most prevalent campaign, a 3.x, currently possesses:
CG
NG
NG
NN

 

[Tilenas]

I'll start.
Currently playing D&D 3.5. My current party consists:
N
CN
CN
CN

Should be a fun...

The usual stuff here, everyone CN except the token paladins and monks, here's the rundown:

LG
LN
CG
CN
CN
CN

 

[Ragmon]

I am part of 3 campaigns so here they are in D&D 3.5 (I hope its within the guide lines):

Campaign #1:
LG
N
CN

Campaign #2:
CG
LN
NG

Campaign #3:
N
CN
CE

 

[Jacob Marley]

Greyhawk (3rd Edition D&D) - LG, LG, CG, TN - Four players, four characters each. I can't remember the alignments of the other twelve.

Greyhawk (3rd Edition D&D) - LG, LG - Five players, one character each. I can't remember the alignments of the other three.

Greyhawk Play-by-Post (1st Edition AD&D) - LG, NG, CG, TN - Five players, one character each. One person has not posted a character yet.

 

[kitcik]

LN Monk/Warblade (me)
CG Ranger/Wizard/Abjurant Champ
CG Ranger
N Druid
NG Druid
CG Bard

EDIT: since other people are saying it, I will add that personally I like NG, LN and CN.

 

[Nebten]

I don't think you'll get an "average" of TN since most games are typically have (good) heroic intentions. Also some games (like mine at times) ban evil PCs, so that throws things off too. Is that the case for you Jon Dahl? I only ask since you have 3 CN in your party

Current Pathfinder Council of Thieves game (this one was decided to be an evil campaign before hand)

CE, NE, CN, LE, and CN who turned CE. This was my girlfriend who backstabbed an insane inmate who was pleasuring himself with a nauty picture book. She snuck up on him and waited until just before he climaxed to shanked him. DM'ing that game, I told her she has now has completed turned to the Dark Side. Innocently she protested. We had a table vote and all the other guys thought that was an ultimate act of evil and deserved an alignment change .

In my WotBS game, the final party was LG, CG, CN, and NE.

In a second edition game I ran 10 years ago I believe the alignments were TN, CG, LG, and CG.

My resent PCs of note had the following alignments: TN, CG, LG, NG, LN, then CN who turned LN.

 

[udalrich]

Do you want Pathfinder games as well? If so:

NE
LN
LN
LN
NG

To throw off your calculations, the universe is predominantly aligned along the chaos/law axis, not the good evil axis. As a result, evil characters are allowed but chaotic ones are forbidden.

 

[Greenfield]

My party is currently:

Ranger/Druid NG
Monk/Tattooed Monk LN
Bard/Sublime Chord CN/CG
Cleric/Wizard CG
Wiz/Rogue CG
Fighter CG

What's funny is that, while the party is predominantly Chaotic, we're the champions of Law in a Law v Chaos campaign.

Oh, wait, we have a semi-permanent NPC Rogue. He's CN too.

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

I'd love to post, but I don't track anyone else's alignment beyond the obvious (like Paladins).

Personally, most of my PCs are, in order: CG, NG, LG, LN, TN. Everythiing else is limited to just a couple of PCs over the years.