Strange New Worlds season 2 - SPOILERS

If Star Trek ever worried about long term side effects then doctors would be obsolete, because transporter operators could do literally everything that they do.
Yep. Transporters are the worst. Store a pattern when you’re healthy, well nourished, and hydrated. Beam down when you need to and have that person make the report. Beam them to nowhere after the mission. Have a neural implant that stores the memories and upload them so there’s no gaps. Need an army? Beam a thousand copies of your security team down with weapons and energy packs to spare.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Transporters in Star Trek only exist because it would have been too expensive to use shuttle craft constantly in the original series. They became a staple of the show. They've been used and abused for plot continually. Best not dwell to long on them....McCoy and Barclay are right.
 

Transporters in Star Trek only exist because it would have been too expensive to use shuttle craft constantly in the original series. They became a staple of the show. They've been used and abused for plot continually. Best not dwell to long on them....McCoy and Barclay are right.
And the time it would take to show them constantly boarding, flying, landing, disembarking, etc. Instead we got a glass of water and some glitter over a green screen.
 

I liked it, but SNW season 1 still has a higher RT score then DS9
RT doesn't work well comparing 1990s to 2020s, because in the 1990s there was a very serious anti-SF bias among the sort of reviewers that RT tracks. So I don't think that proves anything either way.

Transporters in Star Trek only exist because it would have been too expensive to use shuttle craft constantly in the original series. They became a staple of the show. They've been used and abused for plot continually. Best not dwell to long on them....McCoy and Barclay are right.
100% correct. Star Trek without transporters would be a better show, it just wasn't economic initially.

The Orville made the decision to cut transporters, and it has repeatedly proven that was the correct choice.

Episode 4 was an interesting one, though somehow a bit unsatisfying. I think, just because of the nature of the problem, too little of the characters' solutions felt intentional for it to feel like them overcoming the problem.

It also felt a little too conveniently tied up at the end, with a quite remarkable lack of long-term side effects.
I liked it a bit better than that. I thought it was a good episode, on par with most of "good" TNG/DS9, especially as it was actually quite an alarming scenario, and then even had someone managing to make a situation worse by a seemingly reasonable decision, which is very rare genre shows generally, or fiction in general even.
 

Yep. Transporters are the worst. Store a pattern when you’re healthy, well nourished, and hydrated. Beam down when you need to and have that person make the report. Beam them to nowhere after the mission. Have a neural implant that stores the memories and upload them so there’s no gaps. Need an army? Beam a thousand copies of your security team down with weapons and energy packs to spare.
I've always thought these were problems. It's one issue, sort of, that I am trying to explore in the novel I was writing but am currently stuck on.
 


I loved this episode. The memory loss plotline worked great, in a classic Trek way. I loved that the rogue Starfleet officer just outright made himself king, as it's such an obvious plot-point for Star Trek, but I feel, at least, like it hasn't been overused, and yet was sufficiently familiar that they didn't have to dwell on it (also the Yeoman to King career trajectory for "Zach" is just funny). I also liked that we finally got an episode that gave every main character something meaningful to do, which I was starting to worry this season might be light on. And, while I liked the last couple episodes well enough, they both suffered from being wells (trial episode and time travel episode) the franchise goes to too often that I could generally do with less of, and it was good to get back to the core idea of the show, which is visiting new worlds with strange sci-fi premises in need of resolution.

I do have mixed feelings about the Ortegas plotline. After season 1 pointedly had no Ortegas-centric episode, having the episode come back from the credits with her log narration, as they typically do with characters for starring episodes in Star Trek, but then having her abruptly get side-lined until the third act, and having her plot line ultimately resolve with renewed enthusiasm for just being the person who drives the ship seemed like some sort of weird meta-commentary on the character, that I can't quite parse.

It also felt a little too conveniently tied up at the end, with a quite remarkable lack of long-term side effects.
I mean that's just the nature of the beast with episodic Trek. It's easily the weakest part of its storytelling, but its the price you pay to have a totally new adventure next week, and to not have plot-lines drag on for 10 episodes. Star Trek is a wrap everything up in a nice bow at the 52 minute mark franchise at heart, and there's a long history of those wrap ups being comically convenient.

And honestly, I think it's part of why serialized Trek has been such a mixed bag, because a franchise where every problem can traditionally be neatly solved with arbitrary techno-magic in time for the closing credits just isn't particularly fertile grounds for ongoing narratives with sufficient weight to justify the eight hour epic treatment.
 
Last edited:

SNARFZODIACKILLER SEASON 2 REVIEW, EPISODE 1-4

WUT WUT WUT? AFTER A LONG PERIOD OF WITHDRAWAL, I FEEL LIKE I JUST MAINLINED STRAIGHT-UP CLASSIC '80S GNR, BABY. THATS RIGHT. I DONT KNOW WHAT A PARAMOUNT IS, BUT IMA GONNA WATCH SHATKIRK AND HIS CREW EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK, AND TWICE ON SUNDAYS.

FIRST EPISODE WAS GOOD. RIGHT DECISION IN SENDING AWAY SHATKIRK AND HIS DREAMY HAIR. DONT THINK I COULD TAKE THAT MUCH AWESOMENESS ALL AT ONCE. SOMETIMES YOU GOTTA LET THE DRUMMER DO HIS SOLO. AND BY DRUMMER, I MEAN DOCTOR FEELPAIN. ENOUGH OF BORING SADSACK DOCTOR WITH HIDDEN CHILD. THIS IS AWESOME SADSACK DOCTOR THAT DOESNT WANT TO KICK YOUR AZZ ... BUT STILL DOES!

AND DID SOMEONE SAY KLINGONS? LIKE ANY GOOD COVER BAND, THEY KNOW WHEN TO BRING OUT THE HITS. AND THIS IS LED ZEPPLICA WHIPPING OUT WHOLE LOTTA LOVE. SPEAKING OF A WHOLE LOTTA LOVE .... SPOCKPEL? CHASPOCK? KILL ME NOW AND PLAY NOBODYS FOOL AT MY FUNERAL, THIS NON-AGAIN-ON-AGAIN RELATIONSHIP IS THE ROSS AND RACHEL OF OUTER SPACE, IF ROSS AND RACHEL DIDNT SUCK MORE THAN ST ANGER. #LADIESLOVECOOLSPOCK #SPOCKKIRK4LYFE

FINALLY, ENTERPRISE HAS YET ANOTHER NON-SCOTTISH ENGINEER. IS THE NEW ENGINEER OKAY? MAYBE. BUT THE NEW ENGINEER IS NOT HEMMER. #NEVERFORGET #IMNOTCRYINGURCRYING

SECOND EPISODE WAS A TRIAL I THINK. ON THE GOOD SIDE, LOTS OF SHATKIRK HAIR AND HIM LOOKING PENSIVE. SO. HOT. ON THE MINUS SIDE, LOTS OF MYSTIQUE. SZK HAS BEEN ARRESTED A FEW TIMES IN DIFFERENT STATES WITH COMPETENT COURT SYSTEMS (AND MISSISSIPPI) AND HAS NEVER HAD AN EXPERIENCE LIKE THAT. GETTING YOUR GENES ALL UPCHARGED IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN PUBLIC URINATION?

THERE WAS A GOOD MORAL HERE. THINK IT WAS BE EXCELLENT TO EACH OTHER. OR MAYBE IT WAS .... ALL WE OUR IS DUST IN THE WIND, DUDE. I DON'T KNOW, I GOT LOST IN SHATKIRK'S DREAMY EYES FOR MOST OF THE EPISODE.

THIRD EPISODE? O.M.G. YOU WANT TO PLAY THE HITS? YOU WANT TO PLAY THE REAL HITS? THATS RIGHT, SOMEONE IN THE CROWD KEEPS SCREAMING, PLAY FREEBIRD. AND RONNIE VAN ZANDT SHOWS UP AND GRABS THE MIC AND STARTS SINGING. SHATKIRK, MEET REALKIRK.

REALKIRK AND KHAN! TRAVEL BACK IN TIME TO 1967 TO MAKE FUN OF CANADA AND INSURE THAT JOAN COLLINS IS KILLED BY CANADIAN GENETIC SUPREMECISTS. THIS EPISODE HAD EVERYTHING. REALKIRK. BLAMING CANADA. ROMULANS BEING BOTH INCREDBILY SNEAKY AND INCREDIBLY STUPID. A MODERN COMMENTARY ON FRIDGING. A WATCH. #CHEKHOVS WATCH

FINALLY, WE HAD THE FOURTH EPISODE OF PURE METAL. SHATKIRK HAS A LADY FRIEND. I AM ON TO YOU AND YOUR GIFT, LADY FRIEND. FIRST, SHATKIRK AND HIS HAIR AND HIS DREAMY EYES BELONG TO ME... TO US, THE VIEWERS! SECOND, I WATCHED THE FIRST SEASON. SHATKIRK ALREADY HAD TWO LADY FRIENDS. AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE COMMON DENOMINATOR WAS? THATS RIGHT.... EVIL! LADY FRIEND THAT KILLS CHILDREN. LADY FRIEND THAT PIRATES UP STUFF. WE REMEMBER, EVEN IF SHATKIRK DOESNT.

THIS EPISODE ASKS A PROFOUND QUESTION. IS IT BETTER TO BE IGNORANT AND HAPPY, OR KNOWLEDGABLE AND UNHAPPY. EXCEPT ITS MORE IS IT BETTER OT BE IGNORANT AND ENSLAVED AND BEATEN, OR KNOWLEDGABLE AND THE RULERS OF THE PLANET. SHATKIRK MAKES THE RIGHT DECISION.

....BUT I HAVE MY EYE ON THE LADY FRIEND. BECAUSE WE KNOW. WE ALL KNOW. A DEF LEPPARD CANT CHANGE ITS SPOTS. AND A LADY FRIEND OF THE CAPTAIN MUST BE EVIL.

MY RATING FOR THE FIRST 40% OF THE SEASON: 14.378 SHEIK YERBOUTIS
 



Remove ads

Top