catsclaw227
First Post
I noticed no bias one way or another. In fact, I feel the mods were way too lenient to BOTH sides. I was guilty of a few of those arguments myself but I quickly realised the futility and stupidity of getting worked up over what amounts to a personal choice.
If you saw a bias in moderation, I counter and put to you that it was your own personal bias that coloured your perception of the boards at the time, because I'm sure that anyone looking at the period through rational, objective eyes, would see that the only real bias was against people causing arguments left, right and centre, regardless of whose side those arguments represented.
I didn't see much bias either. I think that the bias was felt most by the loud and those that took the introduction of 4e personally (both those who liked 4e and disliked 4e).
Otherwise, in my opinion, the moderation was tighter and bent on keeping the angry, fringe extreme posts in line.
Last edited: