It's always frustrating to agree with the side that has the worst representation.
That depends on the class, though. Artificers only have 4 subclasses and have a bunch of subclass concepts that could be filled (Dr. Frankestein-style fleshstitchers, for example). While others have a ton of subclasses and really don't need more (Clerics and Wizards in particular). And a lot of the subclasses suck, and either need to be replaced with another subclass of a similar niche, or needs to be reprinted in a future book with upgrades.Officially, there are 13 classes and 120 unique subclasses in 5E.
Most people don't even use the ones we have...why do we need more?
/rant
Excuse me?Yep, that's a trap alright.
It varies. Some threads I'm done by page 2. Others, I can go pretty long as the discussion is decent and evolving. Though, eventually it's the same discussion different day.I can't install a poll in the middle of a thread (How I wish I could - but only me, no one else) but wanted to ask people here: How long is your cut-off at which you refuse to even look at a thread?
I was tagged in a thread recently and when I went to check it out saw that in the day or so it has existed it had already reach 60-some-odd pages. Um. .. .
![]()
I mean, before you even start it. . . not how long you follow it.It varies. Some threads I'm done by page 2. Others, I can go pretty long as the discussion is decent and evolving. Though, eventually it's the same discussion different day.
Oh, I'll jump into about 80% of threads. It doesn't bother me if it turns out to be a topic I'm not interested in, or even if it gets offensive. It's pretty easy for me to disengage anytime I feel its necessary. Im here to talk shop and then some.I mean, before you even start it. . . not how long you follow it.