the tablet war is heating up

**the trade-off being open seems to be vulnerable to malware, and the gated store bars some apps from being published.
Lots of apps, not some. That doesn't mean there are lots of rejections, just that potential submissions aren't even made due to the gatekeeper.

For example, there's a really great iOS app called Instapaper that saves things you read on the web into a super-readable form, which you can subsequently grab with your iOS device and read offline. The developer, Marco Arment, has created a version for Kindle but hasn't yet decided to make one for Android.

Take a gander at the Android Market search for Instapaper: 63 matches, none of which was created by the developer. Every one of those that says it's an "Instapaper client" or such -- at least 21 of the 63 -- is stealing his server's services, most are trading off the brand he worked hard to build, and nearly all of them are actually making money off of what he's built (through ads or by charging for the app).

He's contacted Google about the violations but the only one he's managed to stop is one that used his exact icon as well as the name. Do the same search in the iOS App Store and there's one match, the actual Instapaper app.

That's 21 apps that would have been rejected by Apple, or if approved, pulled down the moment Marco contacted Apple.

This is just one example among many thousands. The gatekeeper does a lot more than just protect you from malware (which it does extremely well): it protects developers, it protects intellectual property, and though this seems like an obvious thing, it ensures the app actually does what it says it does, something that doesn't happen in the Android Market and that regularly fools people.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

This is just one example among many thousands. The gatekeeper does a lot more than just protect you from malware (which it does extremely well): it protects developers, it protects intellectual property, and though this seems like an obvious thing, it ensures the app actually does what it says it does, something that doesn't happen in the Android Market and that regularly fools people.


No argument there. I like the gatekeeper effect. lack of a gatekeeper is why Nintendo's game catalog has been sucking on their consoles. because everybody and their dog could pile crap onto the shelves. Sony and MS have kept tighter control, which blocks some crap.

Though I've been stuck by the gatekeeper effect, as well. Apple blocked Sony's Reader app, despite other folks getting theirs in. So I've got e-books I can't read because I can't get them on my iThing. I was inches away from reading books my wife bought....

Personally, the negatives haven't outweighed the benefits. It also helps that I got my iPad for free. If I was more ambitious, the openness of the Android probably would have meant I could fiddle deeper on it. But that's not where my head is anymore.
 

true enough, even just a couple years ago when I investigated it, PS2 emulators were still piss poor. Not enough horsepower in PCs yet.

As a note, it's not because the PS2 was made from amazing future tech. To emulate a processor, generally you create a simulation of that processor in softwarre. that software must run on a processor fast enough that the load of the virtual processor leaves speed left over to do the work that the game expects to be running at.

Running emulators is sort of a bootleg operation, while cool, not a driving feature for a mainstream tablet user. Additionally, most people want to play a game made for the tablet, not a game made for a console with a controller they don't have. Being able to play old games is cool and all, buit not a driving factor for most people.

Of the differences thus far, here's what I smell as significant (wholly my opinion and worth what you paid for it):
direct usb/media ports vs, a dongle with ports
direct data file access vs. email, itunes or drop-box to move files
Flash support vs. no flash*
battery life
fully open app store vs. gatekept app store**
wide mix of HW to support with Android vs. narrow band of HW for iOS to support

There could be more, hopefully I didn't get too nitpicky nor dismissive of anything significant.

*there might be a few browser apps that supply Flash support, instead of Mobile Safari. Also, one could remote desktop to a PC and use the browser there to run a flash page.
**the trade-off being open seems to be vulnerable to malware, and the gated store bars some apps from being published.

I like my iPad1. I use it more for personal stuff on the couch than for work. But then for work, mostly I need a real computer or a notepad to jot things down quickly. In a way, my iPad has become my "home" computer, and my laptop is my "work" computer.

I wouldn't minimize the importance of several of those features.

My *understanding* is that even though the iPad 2 has a dongle it *still* can't replicate several things. I read on a tech advice column that even *with* the USB dongle, the iPad can only pull stuff *off* a flash drive....it can't put stuff *on* the flash drive from the iPad.

And that for printing, it still requires either a $100 accessory to print to a printer.......or the purchase of a printer that supports Apple Air Print or whatever it's called.

Those two things having been said, that's what the article I had read said. I can't attest to its veracity, as nobody I know who has an iPad or iPad 2 has paid for any dongles, so they can't do any of that anyways.

I just print whatever I want off my tablet. Yes, I need a free app for each printer manufacturer, but I've found them available for every printer manufacturer I've needed to work with, and it works fine.

eBook performance is better on iPads though.

I'm not sure if I'm one of the ones who counts the fully open store as a benefit vs. the gatekept one. There are advantages, but disadvantages as well. That impacts me far less (and honestly I don't care about it that much) than being able to easily grab any files on my device and send them out by e-mail (including multiple attachments of different documents created by different apps) and send them out in one e-mail, being able to access the file system etc. In a common workday that's something I depend on.

The few "dongles" I've purchased include an HDMI cable and a USB 3 cable, the two of which cost me a total of $6 from Monoprice. The HDMI is useful when I have to connect to a projector at a client's prem.

There seem to be more interesting games available for iOS.....though the selection is getting better for the Transformer, it's got a long way to go to catch up. I don't use many games on it though....I mean, I have several installed, but it's like with business apps....many of them are just more convenient on a phone format. If I have time to sit down with a larger device, I'm more inclined to go play any number of games on my 360 or PS3, rather than on a tablet. If I'm on the go, it's more convenient to use the games on my iPhone. I think that's just a characteristic of tablets though.....regardless of OS.

Incidentally, a friend of mine got the Playbook, and has been using it for several weeks now, and it's a far better device than some of the tech reviewers seem to give it credit for. Unless the problem is that reviews were done at release, and patches over the last 6 months have fixed things that they were penalizing it for before, I don't get why there's so much hate for it. It's polished, the OS is slick, it renders webpages faster and better than any iPad or Android tablet, and the battery lasts a lot longer than the 4 hours I read about in some reviews back in April. I mean, I hang out with my friend for an hour and a half, and he was playing with his tablet the whole time, and it only used maybe 15% of the battery.

I'm interested to see what will happen next year. If reports of a retina display iPad 3 are true, that'll give it a huge boost, as the 2nd gen Android tablets all seem to be sticking with the 1200x780 (or whatever) resolution screens.

Banshee
 
Last edited:

My *understand* is that even though the iPad 2 has a dongle it *still* can't replicate several things. I read on a tech advice column that even *with* the USB dongle, the iPad can only pull stuff *off* a flash drive....it can't put stuff *on* the iPad.

And that for printing, it still requires either a $100 accessory to print to a printer.......or the purchase of a printer that supports Apple Air Print or whatever it's called.
...snips...Banshee


Good point, for practical use, moving files on/off and printing are critical. Can't replace a PC if you can't readily print.

my network printer doesn't support AirPrint (and at the moment, it quit supporting getting an IP address....). So I"m stuck using a PC if I needed to print.

sounds like Android has a pretty good attach-rate for printers, so Androiders can probably print if they want.

BB's PlayBook is a wierd anomaly. Kind of like HP's webOS tablet. It has some good qualities, but doesn't seem to have the traction to dominate the market.
 

For printing off of my ipad I use the printer pro app. As none of the printers I have access to have wifi, this option has worked best for me.It gives alot of options of how to print it.
 

For printing off of my ipad I use the printer pro app. As none of the printers I have access to have wifi, this option has worked best for me.It gives alot of options of how to print it.

How does that app work for you?

Is it one where the computer connected to the printer has be on, and you use the app, it sends the job to the printer through the PC, and your stuff gets printed?

The ones for Android require individual apps for each manufacturer. That's a bit of a pain....but given the apps are like 1.5 mb in size, it's not a big deal. My printers are Brother and Samsung, and there are apps for each.

Banshee
 

Aye, any day now there will be a really good Android tablet. Just around the corner.
There already are many tablets that offer excellent functionality. The app market isn't there, which is about as unfortunate as the iPad not running Flash. Since I actually have apps purchased for my iPhone that I'd like to keep using, I'm kind of in a quandry about getting an iPad or something else (like the Sony tablet, or the Asus Slider).

My phone contrct is up, and my poor iPhone is beat. Missing its volume rocker, and music is starting to skip more and more often. I figured I'd jump straight to Android, and there is no shortage of phone available, but that's basically flushing all the apps I purchased the iPhone down the crapper.

And like I said, I don't know how an Android user is expected to manage their content. My understanding is that with an Android phone, files are transferred by copy-and-paste. Also, I've no idea how most folks manage podcasts.
 


There already are many tablets that offer excellent functionality. The app market isn't there, which is about as unfortunate as the iPad not running Flash. Since I actually have apps purchased for my iPhone that I'd like to keep using, I'm kind of in a quandry about getting an iPad or something else (like the Sony tablet, or the Asus Slider).


Thats kind of the problem I see with platform buy-in. Once you are invested, switching means dumping that investment.

side question: just how much does not having Flash hurt?

I don't browse anywhere that uses Flash as a natural part of where I go online.

So I don't miss it.
 

just how much does not having Flash hurt?

For me, it's a question of lack of access to certain "news" articles that require it, and more recently, discovering the nifty free time-waster games offers on Yahoo. Some of the games are quite good & challenging, and I've yet to encounter one that WASN'T done in Flash.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top