Yair
Community Supporter
Please resend the update, then; this is the last version I have on file.Nzld said:Yair, the Volkmar you have posted is the older version, not the last (updated) one I sent you.
Please resend the update, then; this is the last version I have on file.Nzld said:Yair, the Volkmar you have posted is the older version, not the last (updated) one I sent you.
What, suddenly no one appreciates my artistic skillsMummyKitty said:While I think my drawing skills might be a little better than Yair's, I don't have any kind of CAD program for producing the neat computer rendered ones like you do.
I think the parameters of the spell are correct for the size of the structure I designed, though I am at a loss as to how you derived the number 54,000 cubic feet. I assume a pace to equate to about 3 feet. What assumption did you use?Yair said:Conjuring the Mystic Structure
CrTe 40 Ritual; R: Touch, D: Mom, T: Group
An elaborate stone structure, formed in accordance with mundane building techniques, rises out of the ground. The structure is up to 54,000 cubic feet in size, and up to 80 feet tall at its highest point. You determine the design of the chambers within.
(Base 3, +1 Touch, +2 Group, +3 size, +3 elaborate design)
As the base Individual for stone is 1 cubic pace, not 1 cubic foot (which is for metal), this seems miscalculated. My calculation for paces (as above) is 1 pace = 3 feet. As is, then, I calculate this spell would destroy 100 cubic paces (or 2700 cubic feet) of stone and dirt. A more efficient version, then, would be Size +1 to destroy 10 cubic paces (or 270 cubic feet) of stone and dirt, at PeTe 10.Yair said:The Mage's Pick, PeTe 15
R: Touch, D: Momentary, T: Part
Up to 100 cubic feet of the earth (including dirt or stone) is destroyd. Controlling the shape of the destroyed volume requires a Finesse roll; an EF 6 suffices for a simple area's excavation, EF 9 is required for a more elaborate excavation such as several intersecting tunnels, and EF 12 or more is required for more elaborate excavations still. The caster can frely choose to excavate less material than the maximum allowed.
The resulting structure is not necessarily stable, and may collapse on itself.
(Base 3, +1 Touch, +1 Part, +2 size)
The designs are for a completed covenant, so I do not anticipate us reaching that point anytime soon... or even, perhaps, before Tribunal. My goal is to get an idea for what we want to achieve, and then we can determine how best to strive for it (and I can make new maps to show the current status as we progress from our first wooden huts, to our first stone room, etc.).MummyKitty said:Nzld, the designs for everything are really great. Some of these plans seem really ambitious, which would make Titus very excited about them. However, given how complex these structures would be, it seems like it would take some time to build them, not to mention needing quite a crew of workmen to haul the stone and wood, etc, up the cliff. I guess we'd be able to use some magic to take shortcuts....
Roman building techniques should be able to handle these structures, it would probably be a matter of manpower. In particular the excavations for the underground structures would be quite labor intensive, it seems to me. Just wondering how much resources we have. If we build something this extensive, we're going to have a hard time hiding it, especially if the Knights come around. Fortified or not they will probably be interested.
Ah, see, I suffer from those numbers again. I blame the British; I think I counted 1 pace=1 feet. Down with Imperial measures! Go metric already!Nzld said:I think the parameters of the spell are correct for the size of the structure I designed, though I am at a loss as to how you derived the number 54,000 cubic feet. I assume a pace to equate to about 3 feet. What assumption did you use?
By my calculations, the volume of the structure (if the entire mass was a single block of stone) is 162,000 cubic feet, or 6000 cubic paces (once again, 1 pace = 3 feet). As a base Group is 10 standard Individuals, our base is then 10 cubic paces, with three raises for Size +3, that allots us 10,000 cubic paces of stone. Since the majority of the structure is hollow and/or open space, we scarcely need that amount, but would likely need more than 1000 cubic paces (which is all Size +2 would allot).
Perhaps they are counting the foundations too (20 extra feet)?This spell can be done as Group, I suppose, though the actual structure is all one building, not individual buildings. Alternately, it could be Individual, but with Size +4. That would, of course, lower it to Level 35, which would be on par with Conjuring the Mystic Tower (although that spell, I believe, is not necessarily calculated correctly. It has a Size +4, but for the amount of stone actually required for the dimensions specified, it only needs a Size +3 (unless, of course, you want a pillar of solid stone).
Again, you are absolutely correct.As the base Individual for stone is 1 cubic pace, not 1 cubic foot (which is for metal), this seems miscalculated. My calculation for paces (as above) is 1 pace = 3 feet. As is, then, I calculate this spell would destroy 100 cubic paces (or 2700 cubic feet) of stone and dirt. A more efficient version, then, would be Size +1 to destroy 10 cubic paces (or 270 cubic feet) of stone and dirt, at PeTe 10.
This version is feasible for spontaneous casting, which is how I anticipated the underground portion would actually be excavated.
I took that into consideration... even counting the additional mass for the foundation, I feel the CtMT should only be Size+3, not Size +4. Not that it matters, I am comfortable with it being a level 35 spell and wouldn't expect it to be only a level 30 spell... just arguing the mechanics... and level 40 for the Teneo version isn't too much to ask for, either.Yair said:Perhaps they are counting the foundations too (20 extra feet)?
I understand where you are coming from, but I disagree on the logic. A building is a Structure, but for purposes of Targets, a non-existent building is not a Structure. Also, as a Group is a collection of Individuals, if a building cannot be considered an Individual, than neither can it be considered a Group, and we know that Creo conjuration spells can only have one or the other as Target. I also don't think it can be argued that a building has many parts, and thus requires Group, as the very spell we are mimicking (Conjuring the Mystical Tower) also creates a building (the tower) and that building surely has multiple parts, as well, yet it is Individual for the purposes of Target.Yair said:A building is a Structure, not an Individual (see PeTe's "castle-raiser" spell, for example), and a Structure must exist before the spell - hence, we can't directly Creo the building. Instead, we Creo the parts and put them together into a building. And the building has many parts, hence Group...
So far, we agree.Nzld said:I understand where you are coming from, but I disagree on the logic. A building is a Structure, but for purposes of Targets, a non-existent building is not a Structure.
Here we differ. If a building is a collection of several blocks of stone that are each Individual target, then I reckon it can be considered a Group. So a building may very well not be an Individual while being a Group. Now, as for why it is a collection instead of an Individual to begin with, the next part...Also, as a Group is a collection of Individuals, if a building cannot be considered an Individual, than neither can it be considered a Group, and we know that Creo conjuration spells can only have one or the other as Target.
Ahh, not so. The spell specifically states the tower is made from one block of stone. The spell creates ONE stone, albeit formed in a fancy and elaborate shape, and is hence an Individual. Our spell creates many different stones, and hence requires a Group target.I also don't think it can be argued that a building has many parts, and thus requires Group, as the very spell we are mimicking (Conjuring the Mystical Tower) also creates a building (the tower) and that building surely has multiple parts, as well, yet it is Individual for the purposes of Target.
Mmm, with this logic there is no sense to the Room or Structure or even Boundary targets. Why target a Boundary to affect, say, a field - when what I want to do is affect the Individual field? Mythically, it makes perfect sense for it to be an Individual.As for End of the Mighty Castle, it uses Target: Structure as a convenience, and possibly to allow it to specifically destroy all stone within the structure as well, but I believe that within the rules, it could have been written with Target: Individual, but would have then required Size +3 to make up for the loss of size inherent to Target: Structure (×1000), so the spell level would be the same.