Ruin Explorer
Legend
We have absolutely not one tiny shred of evidence that any of those "spellcasters" are "wizards" or that there's any crossover in terms of "spells", as far as I recall. What's your evidence there is?We know for a fact that spellcasters were among elves, orcs and men at the very least. And that Gandalf was casting spells at Moria at the very least, not using divine power, unless he's also a liar and I don't think Tolkien intended him to be a liar.
As for Moria, it's not clear Gandalf even was fully aware he was a Maiar at that time. And there's no reason to believe the "spells" weren't fuelled by divine power - when, exactly, did Gandalf say they weren't?
Absolutely not.That's my entire point. There are Mair that aren't Istari and therefore are not wizards, that means that the Istari have to be both Maiar AND izards
Again, look at the links.
You literally do not understand LotR. 100% of characters called "wizards" are Istari Maiar. There are no "wizards" who are not Istari Maiar.
Istari Maiar are Maiar who are weaker (or merely more restrained) seemingly in order that they don't cause absolute screaming chaos like the more powerful Maiar. That's the difference. They're supposed to play it smart, not powerful. But there's no evidence anyone else in Middle Earth is a "wizard", and clear evidence that wizard and Istari are simply terms for the same thing.
Again if you think Istari are using the same spells as other spellcasters, let's hear your examples.
Last edited: