RangerWickett
Legend
Last edited:
I'd be surprised if there were too many of them. Instead, imagine a focus group that was presented with two books. In one book, the art was slightly more scantily-clad than the other. Nobody in the focus group really noticed the difference, but when they were interviewed, they had a more positive opinion about the sexier book, due to subconsciously noticing the art. When asked why they liked it better, they talked about the writing quality, the layout, the content, and maybe the art too, which was "better," but not for any specific reason.Cadfan said:I sort of agree with this from a cold, hard, marketing perspective. But how far are you going to take this?
Anyways, I have extremely negative personal opinions of the sorts of people who get all hot and bothered over artwork of women in D&D.
Gods, no. What sort of idiot wizard would create a spell that turns your enemies directly into treasure, but only for a second? Back to the drawing board, Merlin! The poor sap has to stay gold long enough for us to spend him!ehren37 said:But why automatically assume that its the case? I mean, maybe people explode into piles of gold that reform into corpses moments later after being killed. Would you defend that with the same argument?
Wik said:But what I *don't* like seeing is the fact that half-orcs and dwarves are only men. I think I've seen ONE picture of a female half-orc or dwarf in any wotc product, and that annoys me.
Then why beat around the bush?Titillation IS common sense when marketing to teen boys as your PRIMARY demographic.
Very cool. I wish this was preview 4e art.Erik Mona said:Or perhaps you prefer elves.
Frankly, I think that "Attractiveness" extends to more than big breasts or huge muscles.kiznit said:Frankly, I demand all the heroic characters I'm pretending to be to be attractive.
Sounds comically hideous. Sign me up!Rechan said:Frankly, I think that "Attractiveness" extends to more than bigor huge muscles.