D&D Movie/TV Bridgerton Star Regé-Jean Page Joins D&D Movie

Regé-Jean Page has joined the cast of the upcoming Dungeons & Dragons movie - which currently has Chris Pine, Michelle Rodriguez, and Justice Smith attached - in a leading role, according to Hollywood Reporter. He played the Duke of Hastings in the period drama which is Netflix's biggest ever show. https://www.enworld.org/threads/chris-pine-to-star-in-d-d-movie.677045/...

Regé-Jean Page has joined the cast of the upcoming Dungeons & Dragons movie - which currently has Chris Pine, Michelle Rodriguez, and Justice Smith attached - in a leading role, according to Hollywood Reporter. He played the Duke of Hastings in the period drama which is Netflix's biggest ever show.

BRIDGERTON_108_Unit_01959R.jpg



 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad



BookTenTiger

He / Him
Does there need to be a distinction of character classes in the game? Does it need a call-out to class and race and sub-class and feats and ability scores and such to be a good D&D movie?

I mean, if a character throws a fireball and fights with a sword and heals someone with a spell and rages and casts a ritual and turns undead and backstabs someone and changes shape into an animal, will people freak out that it's too many class abilities stuffed into one character for a D&D movie?
I think each character should have a freeze-frame with their stats.

Kind of kidding?
 

Does there need to be a distinction of character classes in the game? Does it need a call-out to class and race and sub-class and feats and ability scores and such to be a good D&D movie?

I mean, if a character throws a fireball and fights with a sword and heals someone with a spell and rages and casts a ritual and turns undead and backstabs someone and changes shape into an animal, will people freak out that it's too many class abilities stuffed into one character for a D&D movie?
Yes. (Just joking, but only sort of).

But you probably don't want that sort of character in a movie anyway; it would make them a Mary Sue and cause the others to be redundant or useless. If (as seems likely), we're going to have several leads, it would probably be best to give them clearly defined roles on the group. And D&D classes will definitely help with defining those roles. That doesn't mean they nees to follow the rules 100%, but using defined classes as a base wouldn't hurt.
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
Does there need to be a distinction of character classes in the game? Does it need a call-out to class and race and sub-class and feats and ability scores and such to be a good D&D movie?

I mean, if a character throws a fireball and fights with a sword and heals someone with a spell and rages and casts a ritual and turns undead and backstabs someone and changes shape into an animal, will people freak out that it's too many class abilities stuffed into one character for a D&D movie?
I don't think they'd stick that many things on one character from a writing standpoint -- we're not telling a story about Superman here. And having a few things that cross class lines will actually mean endless discussions where people create builds of the movie characters.
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
If (as seems likely), we're going to have several leads, it would probably be best to give them clearly defined roles on the group. And D&D classes will definitely help with defining those roles. That doesn't mean they nees to follow the rules 100%, but using defined classes as a base wouldn't hurt.
The Ocean's 11 movies are a good example of this: Everyone is a specialist and (mostly) gets a chance to shine. It'll be the path of least resistance to do something similar for this movie.
 

doctorbadwolf

Heretic of The Seventh Circle
If you really believe that the ethnic make up of the British Nobility and upper class in Regency England was the result of atrocious racism, then you have just admitted to a startling degree of historical ignorance.
Considering the number of people of color in Britain at that time and earlier (vastly more than you probably think), the number of common folk raised into the gentry in that time and earlier, it’s not historically ignorant at all.

If one caste is one ethnicity, and another ethnicity cannot enter that caste even though members of the first ethnicity can move from one to the other, that is racism. The end.
 

Gradine

The Elephant in the Room (she/her)
For instance, there was actually a concerted effort in the early 20th century to remove Black people and women from the American literary canon, which is why the grandchildren of people who read and adored Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Charles W. Chesnutt had no idea these major 19th century figures existed.

If you like Turn of the Screw, check out Gilman's The Yellow Wallpaper. If you like Twain, check out Chesnutt. They can stand shoulder to shoulder with the folks you know, but some old dead White dudes decided you didn't need to know their names.
The Yellow Wallpaper is indeed very good, though it would be remiss to recommend it without pointing out that Gilman was pants-on-head racist, like at a "Lovecraft-might-ask-her-to-dial-it-back-a-bit" level

e: This is not to say that The Yellow Wallpaper demonstrates any of that racism, which I realize I might have implied while alluding to Lovecraft.
 

doctorbadwolf

Heretic of The Seventh Circle
The Yellow Wallpaper is indeed very good, though it would be remiss to recommend it without pointing out that Gilman was pants-on-head racist, like at a "Lovecraft-might-ask-her-to-dial-it-back-a-bit" level

e: This is not to say that The Yellow Wallpaper demonstrates any of that racism, which I realize I might have implied while alluding to Lovecraft.
Great, now any time someone talks about American racism I’m gonna mentally photoshop pants onto the head of that one screaming guy in the polo shirt with the tiki torch...😂
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top